NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal) vs AMD Radeon RX 5700
The TITAN X (Pascal) has 14% better performance than the Radeon RX 5700 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon RX 5700 has 200% better value for the money than the TITAN X (Pascal) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal) GPU
The TITAN X (Pascal) is an end-of-life desktop graphics card by NVIDIA. It launched in Q3 2016 with a suggested retail price of $1,199. Its GP102 chip that powers the GPU uses the Pascal architecture and is fabricated on the 16 nm process.
This GPU is paired with 12 GB of GDDR5X VRAM. Its 1,251 MHz memory clock and 384 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 480.4 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
The TITAN X (Pascal) is a dual slot graphics card, taking up 2 PCIe slots. It supports 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a display ports. This desktop card has a TDP of 250 W. NVIDIA recommends using a power supply of at least 600 W with this card. A power supply lower than this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
The TITAN X (Pascal) has the 53rd highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 34.30% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 35,995 score and $1,199 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 30.02. This is the 77th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
About the AMD Radeon RX 5700 GPU
The Radeon RX 5700 is a desktop graphics card by AMD. It launched in Q3 2019 with a suggested retail price of $349. Its Navi 10 chip that powers the GPU uses the RDNA 1.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 7 nm process.
This GPU is paired with 8 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. Its 1,750 MHz memory clock and 256 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 448 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
The RX 5700 is a dual slot graphics card, taking up 2 PCIe slots. It supports HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4a display ports. This desktop card has a TDP of 180 W. AMD recommends using a power supply of at least 450 W with this card. A power supply lower than this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
The Radeon RX 5700 has the 69th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 29.99% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 31,470 score and $349 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 90.17. This is the 24th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | TITAN X (Pascal) | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q3 2016 | Q3 2019 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $1,199 | $349 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
F1 24 | TITAN X (Pascal) | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 205 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 179 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 130 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 94 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | 72 FPS |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | 42 FPS |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 5700 | 41.8 | |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 22.2 | -47% |
| Arc A770 | 21.2 | -49% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 17 | -59% |
| Arc A750 | 16.8 | -60% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | 13.9 | -67% |
| Radeon RX 6600 | 9.5 | -77% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 5700 | 8.35 | |
| Arc A770 | 15.52 | +86% |
| Arc A750 | 17.2 | +106% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 17.97 | +115% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | 28.71 | +244% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 29.35 | +252% |
| Radeon RX 6600 | 34.63 | +315% |
Benchmark Performance
The TITAN X (Pascal) has 14% better performance than the Radeon RX 5700 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The TITAN X (Pascal) is ranked 53rd with a score of 35,995, and the Radeon RX 5700 is ranked 69th with a score of 31,470.
The Radeon RX 5700 has 200% better value for the money than the TITAN X (Pascal) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The TITAN X (Pascal) is ranked 77th with a performance per dollar of 30.02, and the Radeon RX 5700 is ranked 24th with a performance per dollar of 90.17.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | 37,671.5 | +5% |
| Arc A750 | 37,288 | +4% |
| TITAN X (Pascal) | 35,995 | |
| Radeon RX 5700 XT | 35,822.5 | -0% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 35,683 | -1% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 35,032 | -3% |
| Radeon RX 6600 | 31,774 | -12% |
| Radeon RX 5700 | 31,470 | -13% |
| Radeon RX 5600 XT | 31,310 | -13% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 | 31,260 | -13% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1660 | 96.49 | +221% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 95.99 | +220% |
| Radeon RX 5700 | 90.17 | +200% |
| Radeon RX 5700 XT | 89.78 | +199% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 89.43 | +198% |
| GeForce GTX 1080 | 48.85 | +63% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 47.21 | +57% |
| TITAN X (Pascal) | 30.02 | |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | TITAN X (Pascal) | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 9,076 (+12.73%) | 8,051 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 9,417 (+11.08%) | 8,478 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 135,092 (+1.64%) | 132,911 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 27,315.5 (+15.03%) | 23,746 |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | 104,649 (+18.76%) | 88,119 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 30,628 (+10.77%) | 27,649.5 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 122 | -- |
| PassMark G3D Mark | -- | 14,480 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | -- | 889 |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | TITAN X (Pascal) | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GP102 | Navi 10 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Size | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Transistors | 11,800 million | 10,300 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | TITAN X (Pascal) | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 480.4 Gb/s | 448 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,251 MHz | 1,750 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 384 bit | 256 bit |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | -- |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | TITAN X (Pascal) | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 2 slots | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 W | 180 W |
| Suggested PSU | 600 W | 450 W |
| Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | TITAN X (Pascal) | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 2,304 |
| CUDA Cores | 3,584 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 36 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 28 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 224 | 144 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 96 | 64 |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,417 MHz | 1,465 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,531 MHz | 1,725 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | TITAN X (Pascal) | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 147 GPixel/s | 110.4 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 342.9 GTexel/s | 248.4 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 10.97 TFLOPS | 7.95 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 342.9 GFLOPS | 496.8 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | TITAN X (Pascal) | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.