Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
TITAN X (Pascal)433% better
35,99534% of 104,737
Radeon Pro 460
6,7496% of 104,737
The TITAN X (Pascal) has 433% better performance than the Radeon Pro 460 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
TITAN X (Pascal)
30.0219% of 161.45
Radeon Pro 460
No data available
The TITAN X (Pascal) has 19% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop TITAN X (Pascal)
Shop Radeon Pro 460
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal) GPU
The NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal) is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q3 2016 with a MSRP of $1,199. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP102) and is manufactured on a 16 nm process.
Memory
The TITAN X has 12 GB of GDDR5X memory, with a 1,251 MHz memory clock and a 384 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 480.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The TITAN X includes 3,584 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,417 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,531 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 224 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 96 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The TITAN X occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 600 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 250 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The TITAN X has the 55th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 34.37% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 35,995 score and $1,199 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 30.02. This is the 79th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
About the AMD Radeon Pro 460 GPU
The AMD Radeon Pro 460 is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q4 2016. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Baffin) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Memory
The Pro 460 has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,270 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 81.28 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Pro 460 includes 1,024 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 850 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 907 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 35 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The Pro 460 has the 222nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 6.44% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | TITAN X (Pascal) | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q3 2016 | Q4 2016 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $1,199 | -- |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Rise of the Tomb Raider
The Witcher 3
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided | TITAN X (Pascal) | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | -- | 67 FPS |
| Medium - 768p | -- | -- |
| High - 1080p | -- | 25 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 12 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:TITAN X (Pascal) orRadeon Pro 460
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | 21 | +72% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | 21 | +72% |
| Radeon HD 8970M | 16.6 | +36% |
| Quadro P2000 Mobile | 16 | +31% |
| Radeon Pro 560X | 13.1 | +7% |
| Radeon Pro 460 | 12.2 | |
| GeForce GTX 965M | 12 | -2% |
| GeForce GTX 880M | 11.7 | -4% |
| GeForce GTX 960M | 10 | -18% |
| GeForce GTX 870M | 9.3 | -24% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:TITAN X (Pascal) orRadeon Pro 460
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
TITAN X (Pascal)433% better
35,99534% of 104,737
Radeon Pro 460
6,7496% of 104,737
The TITAN X (Pascal) has 433% better performance than the Radeon Pro 460 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The TITAN X (Pascal) is ranked 55th with a score of 35,995, and the Radeon Pro 460 is ranked 222nd with a score of 6,749.
Performance per dollar
TITAN X (Pascal)
30.0219% of 161.45
Radeon Pro 460
No data available
The TITAN X (Pascal) has 46% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
TITAN X (Pascal)'s 30.02 performance per dollar ranks it 79th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:TITAN X (Pascal) or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | 37,671.5 | +5% |
| Arc A750 | 37,288 | +4% |
| TITAN X (Pascal) | 35,995 | |
| Radeon RX 5700 XT | 35,822.5 | -0% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 34,963.5 | -3% |
| Radeon HD 8970M | 6,818 | -81% |
| Radeon R9 M290X | 6,817 | -81% |
| Radeon Pro 460 | 6,749 | -81% |
| GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) | 6,736 | -81% |
| Radeon 660M | 6,651.5 | -82% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:TITAN X (Pascal) orRadeon Pro 460
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 2080 | 57.62 | +92% |
| Radeon VII | 54.19 | +81% |
| GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | 53.89 | +80% |
| GeForce GTX 1080 | 48.85 | +63% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 47.21 | +57% |
| TITAN X (Pascal) | 30.02 | |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | TITAN X (Pascal) | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 9,076 | -- |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 9,417 (+585.37%) | 1,374 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 135,092 (+399.16%) | 27,064 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 27,315.5 (+495.89%) | 4,584 |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | 104,649 | -- |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 30,628 (+339.87%) | 6,963 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 122 (+6.36%) | 114.7 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | -- | 3,453 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | -- | 679 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | TITAN X (Pascal) | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GP102 | Baffin |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Size | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Transistors | 11,800 million | 3,000 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | TITAN X (Pascal) | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 12 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 480.4 Gb/s | 81.28 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,251 MHz | 1,270 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 384 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 16 KB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 1,024 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | TITAN X (Pascal) | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 2 slots | -- |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 W | 35 W |
| Suggested PSU | 600 W | -- |
| Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | -- |
| Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | TITAN X (Pascal) | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 1,024 |
| CUDA Cores | 3,584 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 16 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 28 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 224 | 64 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 96 | 16 |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,417 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,531 MHz | 907 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | TITAN X (Pascal) | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 147 GPixel/s | 14.51 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 342.9 GTexel/s | 58.05 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 10.97 TFLOPS | 1.86 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 342.9 GFLOPS | 116.1 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | TITAN X (Pascal) | Radeon Pro 460 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.