PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

NVIDIA T500 Mobile vs Intel Arc A770M

NVIDIA
VS
Intel
Performance
T500 Mobile
7,995.58% of 104,737
Arc A770M367% better
37,37536% of 104,737

The Arc A770M has 367% better performance than the T500 Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
T500 Mobile
No data available
Arc A770M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the T500 Mobile and the Arc A770M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop T500 Mobile
Shop Arc A770M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA T500 Mobile GPU

The NVIDIA T500 Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q4 2020. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU117) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.

Memory

The T500 Mobile has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,250 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 80 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The T500 Mobile includes 896 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,185 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,560 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 56 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 18 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The T500 Mobile has the 207th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.63% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the Intel Arc A770M GPU

The Intel Arc A770M is a mobile graphics card that launched in 2022. It is built on the Generation 12.7 GPU microarchitecture (codename DG2-512) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.

Memory

The Arc A770M has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 2,000 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 512 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Arc A770M includes 4,096 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,650 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,050 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 256 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 128 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 512 Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX) optimized for AI workloads and 32 ray tracing units dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 120 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Arc A770M has the 48th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 35.68% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoT500 MobileArc A770M
ManufacturerNVIDIAIntel
ArchitectureTuringGeneration 12.7
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ4 20202022
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Display FPS for Helldivers 2
Helldivers 2
Display FPS for Palworld
Palworld
Display FPS for The Finals
The Finals
Display FPS for Total War: PHARAOH
Total War: PHARAOH
Display FPS for EA Sports FC 24
EA Sports FC 24

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 24
F1 24
T500 MobileArc A770M
Low - 1080p
--
229 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
196 FPS
High - 1080p
--
151 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
49 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:T500 Mobile orArc A770M

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:T500 Mobile orArc A770M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
T500 Mobile
7,995.58% of 104,737
Arc A770M367% better
37,37536% of 104,737

The Arc A770M has 367% better performance than the T500 Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The T500 Mobile is ranked 207th with a score of 7,995.5, and the Arc A770M is ranked 48th with a score of 37,375.

Performance per dollar
T500 Mobile
No data available
Arc A770M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the T500 Mobile and the Arc A770M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:T500 Mobile or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile37,933+374%
Radeon RX 7700S37,918+374%
Arc A770M37,375+367%
Radeon RX 7600M XT37,202+365%
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile36,969.5+362%
Quadro P2000 Mobile8,148+2%
T550 Mobile8,066.5+1%
T500 Mobile7,995.5
Radeon RX 460 Mobile7,792.5-3%
GeForce GTX 780M7,776.5-3%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:T500 Mobile orArc A770M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkT500 MobileArc A770M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1,787.5
10,783
(+503.24%)
3DMark Time Spy Score
1,958
10,997
(+461.64%)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
23,453
124,487
(+430.79%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
4,224.5
25,563
(+505.11%)
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
--
112,098
3DMark 11 Performance Score
8,132
29,170
(+258.71%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
173
216.5
(+25.14%)
PassMark G3D Mark
--
11,539
PassMark G2D Mark
--
716
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecT500 MobileArc A770M
CodenameTU117DG2-512
ArchitectureTuringGeneration 12.7
Process Size12 nm6 nm
Transistors4,700 million21,700 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecT500 MobileArc A770M
Memory Size4 GB16 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth80 Gb/s512 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,250 MHz2,000 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit256 bit
L1 Cache64 KB6 MB
L2 Cache1,024 KB16 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecT500 MobileArc A770M
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)18 W120 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecT500 MobileArc A770M
Shading Units--4,096
CUDA Cores896--
Execution Units (EU)--4,096
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)14--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)56256
Render Output Units (ROP)32128
Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX)--512
Ray Tracing Units (RTU)--32
Core Clock Speed1,185 MHz1,650 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,560 MHz2,050 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecT500 MobileArc A770M
Pixel Fill Rate49.92 GPixel/s262.4 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate87.36 GTexel/s524.8 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance2.8 TFLOPS16.79 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance87.36 GFLOPS--

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecT500 MobileArc A770M
DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.76.6

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.