NVIDIA T500 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

VS
Performance
T500 Mobile84% better
7,995.58% of 104,598
Radeon Pro WX 3200
4,337.54% of 104,598

The T500 Mobile has 84% better performance than the Radeon Pro WX 3200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
T500 Mobile
No data available
Radeon Pro WX 3200
21.814% of 161.45

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 14% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.

Shop T500 Mobile
Shop Radeon Pro WX 3200
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA T500 Mobile GPU

The NVIDIA T500 Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q4 2020. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU117) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.

Memory

The T500 Mobile has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,250 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 80 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The T500 Mobile includes 896 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,185 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,560 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 56 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 18 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The T500 Mobile has the 207th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.64% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 GPU

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a workstation graphics card that launched in Q3 2019 with a MSRP of $199. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Polaris 23) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Pro WX 3200 has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 96 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Pro WX 3200 includes 640 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,295 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The Pro WX 3200 is a compact, low-profile graphics card that fits into 1 PCIe expansion slot. It supports mini-DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 250 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 65 W.

Benchmark Performance & Value

The Pro WX 3200 has the 267th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 4.15% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 4,337.5 score and $199 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 21.8. This is the 84th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoT500 MobileRadeon Pro WX 3200
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureTuringGCN 4.0
Market SegmentMobileWorkstation
Release DateQ4 2020Q3 2019
Launch Price (MSRP)--$199
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Control
Control
Display FPS for F1 2019
F1 2019
Display FPS for Total War: Three Kingdoms
Total War: Three Kingdoms
Display FPS for Rage 2
Rage 2
Display FPS for Metro Exodus
Metro Exodus
Display FPS for Apex Legends
Apex Legends
Display FPS for X-Plane 11
X-Plane 11

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Control
Control
T500 MobileRadeon Pro WX 3200
Low - 720p
--
42 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
13 FPS
High - 1080p
--
8 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:T500 Mobile orRadeon Pro WX 3200
GPUFrames Per Second
Our database does not have enough FPS data to compare with other GPUs.

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:T500 Mobile orRadeon Pro WX 3200
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
T500 Mobile84% better
7,995.58% of 104,598
Radeon Pro WX 3200
4,337.54% of 104,598

The T500 Mobile has 84% better performance than the Radeon Pro WX 3200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The T500 Mobile is ranked 207th with a score of 7,995.5, and the Radeon Pro WX 3200 is ranked 267th with a score of 4,337.5.

Performance per dollar
T500 Mobile
No data available
Radeon Pro WX 3200
21.814% of 161.45

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 33% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

Radeon Pro WX 3200's 21.8 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:T500 Mobile or
GPUBenchmark Performance
RTX A2000 (12 GB)19,978+150%
Quadro P400015,433+93%
Quadro P2000 Mobile8,148+2%
T550 Mobile8,066.5+1%
T500 Mobile7,995.5
Radeon RX 460 Mobile7,792.5-3%
GeForce GTX 780M7,776.5-3%
Radeon Pro WX 32004,337.5-46%
Radeon Pro WX 31003,690.5-54%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:T500 Mobile orRadeon Pro WX 3200
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
RTX A200044.49+104%
RTX A2000 (12 GB)44.49+104%
Radeon Pro WX 320021.8
Radeon PRO W680019.74-9%
Quadro P400018.94-13%
Radeon Pro WX 310018.55-15%
RTX A600010.96-50%
RTX 6000 Ada Generation10.42-52%
Quadro P50008.04-63%

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkT500 MobileRadeon Pro WX 3200
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1,787.5
(+87.07%)
955.5
3DMark Time Spy Score
1,958
(+84.89%)
1,059
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
23,453
(+24.31%)
18,866
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
4,224.5
(+33.86%)
3,156
3DMark 11 Performance Score
8,132
(+74.62%)
4,657
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
173
(+126.14%)
76.5
PassMark G3D Mark
--
2,438
PassMark G2D Mark
--
417
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecT500 MobileRadeon Pro WX 3200
CodenameTU117Polaris 23
ArchitectureTuringGCN 4.0
Process Size12 nm14 nm
Transistors4,700 million2,200 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecT500 MobileRadeon Pro WX 3200
Memory Size4 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth80 Gb/s96 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,250 MHz1,500 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit128 bit
L1 Cache64 KB16 KB
L2 Cache1,024 KB512 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecT500 MobileRadeon Pro WX 3200
Slots--1 slot
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)18 W65 W
Suggested PSU--250 W
OutputsDevice Dependentmini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecT500 MobileRadeon Pro WX 3200
Stream Processors (SP)--640
CUDA Cores896--
Compute Units (CU)--10
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)14--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)5632
Render Output Units (ROP)3216
Core Clock Speed1,185 MHz1,295 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,560 MHz--

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecT500 MobileRadeon Pro WX 3200
Pixel Fill Rate49.92 GPixel/s20.72 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate87.36 GTexel/s41.44 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance2.8 TFLOPS1.66 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance87.36 GFLOPS103.6 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecT500 MobileRadeon Pro WX 3200
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
OpenCL3.02.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.76.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.