NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350
The RTX A5500 Mobile has 474% better performance than the GeForce MX350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the RTX A5500 Mobile and the GeForce MX350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile GPU
The NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2022. It is built on the Ampere GPU microarchitecture (codename GA103) and is manufactured on a 8 nm process.
Memory
The RTX A5500 Mobile has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 2,000 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 512 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RTX A5500 Mobile includes 7,424 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 975 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,500 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 232 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 96 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 232 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 58 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 165 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The RTX A5500 Mobile has the 57th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 33.78% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA GeForce MX350 GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce MX350 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2020. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP107S) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Memory
The MX350 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,752 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 56.06 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The MX350 includes 640 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,354 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,468 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 20 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The MX350 has the 227th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.89% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | RTX A5500 Mobile | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q1 2022 | Q1 2020 |
| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Sons of the Forest | RTX A5500 Mobile | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 26 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 14 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 13 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | 20.8 | +63% |
| Radeon RX 560X Mobile | 20.3 | +59% |
| Radeon 660M | 15.3 | +20% |
| GeForce MX350 | 12.8 | |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The RTX A5500 Mobile has 474% better performance than the GeForce MX350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The RTX A5500 Mobile is ranked 57th with a score of 35,376, and the GeForce MX350 is ranked 227th with a score of 6,166.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the RTX A5500 Mobile and the GeForce MX350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| RTX A5000 Mobile | 36,163.5 | +2% |
| Radeon RX 6800S | 36,101 | +2% |
| RTX A5500 Mobile | 35,376 | |
| Radeon RX 7600M | 35,101 | -1% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | 34,897 | -1% |
| GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) | 6,736 | -81% |
| Radeon 660M | 6,651.5 | -81% |
| GeForce MX350 | 6,166 | -83% |
| GeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition) | 6,071 | -83% |
| GeForce GTX 680M | 5,897.5 | -83% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | RTX A5500 Mobile | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 9,568 (+616.44%) | 1,335.5 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 9,872 (+562.11%) | 1,491 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 104,565 (+322.59%) | 24,744 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 26,260 (+500.78%) | 4,371 |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | -- | 17,916 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 30,135 (+372.63%) | 6,376 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 366 (+232.73%) | 110 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 17,361 (+519.37%) | 2,803 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 708 (+193.78%) | 241 |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | RTX A5500 Mobile | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GA103 | GP107S |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Size | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Transistors | 22,000 million | 3,300 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | RTX A5500 Mobile | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 Gb/s | 56.06 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 2,000 MHz | 1,752 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 256 bit | 64 bit |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 512 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | RTX A5500 Mobile | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 W | 20 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | RTX A5500 Mobile | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| CUDA Cores | 7,424 | 640 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 58 | 5 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 232 | 32 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 96 | 16 |
| Tensor Cores | 232 | -- |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 58 | -- |
| Core Clock Speed | 975 MHz | 1,354 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,500 MHz | 1,468 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | RTX A5500 Mobile | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 144 GPixel/s | 23.49 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 348 GTexel/s | 46.98 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 22.27 TFLOPS | 1.88 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 348 GFLOPS | 58.72 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | RTX A5500 Mobile | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.