Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
RTX A5500 Mobile716% better
35,37634% of 104,598
Radeon Pro WX 3200
4,337.54% of 104,598
The RTX A5500 Mobile has 716% better performance than the Radeon Pro WX 3200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
RTX A5500 Mobile
No data available
Radeon Pro WX 3200
21.814% of 161.45
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 14% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop RTX A5500 Mobile
Shop Radeon Pro WX 3200
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile GPU
The NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2022. It is built on the Ampere GPU microarchitecture (codename GA103) and is manufactured on a 8 nm process.
Memory
The RTX A5500 Mobile has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 2,000 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 512 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RTX A5500 Mobile includes 7,424 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 975 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,500 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 232 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 96 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 232 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 58 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 165 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The RTX A5500 Mobile has the 57th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 33.82% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 GPU
The AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a workstation graphics card that launched in Q3 2019 with a MSRP of $199. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Polaris 23) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Memory
The Pro WX 3200 has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 96 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Pro WX 3200 includes 640 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,295 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The Pro WX 3200 is a compact, low-profile graphics card that fits into 1 PCIe expansion slot. It supports mini-DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 250 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 65 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The Pro WX 3200 has the 267th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 4.15% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 4,337.5 score and $199 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 21.8. This is the 84th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | RTX A5500 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Workstation |
| Release Date | Q1 2022 | Q3 2019 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | -- | $199 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Far Cry 6
Returnal
Cyberpunk 2077 (1.6)
EA Sports F1 22
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
God of War
Guardians of the Galaxy
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Far Cry 6 | RTX A5500 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | 132 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | 115 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 104 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 95 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | 79 FPS | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | 42 FPS | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:RTX A5500 Mobile orRadeon Pro WX 3200
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | 69 | +64% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile | 53 | +26% |
| RTX A5000 Mobile | 51 | +21% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | 45 | +7% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile | 43 | +2% |
| RTX A5500 Mobile | 42 | |
| Arc A770M | 40.2 | -4% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | 38 | -10% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | 35 | -17% |
| Arc A730M | 26.3 | -37% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:RTX A5500 Mobile orRadeon Pro WX 3200
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
RTX A5500 Mobile716% better
35,37634% of 104,598
Radeon Pro WX 3200
4,337.54% of 104,598
The RTX A5500 Mobile has 716% better performance than the Radeon Pro WX 3200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The RTX A5500 Mobile is ranked 57th with a score of 35,376, and the Radeon Pro WX 3200 is ranked 267th with a score of 4,337.5.
Performance per dollar
RTX A5500 Mobile
No data available
Radeon Pro WX 3200
21.814% of 161.45
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 33% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
Radeon Pro WX 3200's 21.8 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:RTX A5500 Mobile or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| RTX A5000 Mobile | 36,163.5 | +2% |
| Radeon RX 6800S | 36,101 | +2% |
| RTX A5500 Mobile | 35,376 | |
| Radeon RX 7600M | 35,101 | -1% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | 34,897 | -1% |
| RTX A2000 (12 GB) | 19,978 | -44% |
| Quadro P4000 | 15,433 | -56% |
| Radeon Pro WX 3200 | 4,337.5 | -88% |
| Radeon Pro WX 3100 | 3,690.5 | -90% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:RTX A5500 Mobile orRadeon Pro WX 3200
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| RTX A2000 | 44.49 | +104% |
| RTX A2000 (12 GB) | 44.49 | +104% |
| Radeon Pro WX 3200 | 21.8 | |
| Radeon PRO W6800 | 19.74 | -9% |
| Quadro P4000 | 18.94 | -13% |
| Radeon Pro WX 3100 | 18.55 | -15% |
| RTX A6000 | 10.96 | -50% |
| RTX 6000 Ada Generation | 10.42 | -52% |
| Quadro P5000 | 8.04 | -63% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | RTX A5500 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 9,568 (+901.36%) | 955.5 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 9,872 (+832.2%) | 1,059 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 104,565 (+454.25%) | 18,866 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 26,260 (+732.07%) | 3,156 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 30,135 (+547.09%) | 4,657 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 366 (+378.43%) | 76.5 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 17,353 (+611.77%) | 2,438 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 705 (+69.06%) | 417 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | RTX A5500 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GA103 | Polaris 23 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Size | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Transistors | 22,000 million | 2,200 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | RTX A5500 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 16 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 Gb/s | 96 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 2,000 MHz | 1,500 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 256 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 16 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 512 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | RTX A5500 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | -- | 1 slot |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 W | 65 W |
| Suggested PSU | -- | 250 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | RTX A5500 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 640 |
| CUDA Cores | 7,424 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 10 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 58 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 232 | 32 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 96 | 16 |
| Tensor Cores | 232 | -- |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 58 | -- |
| Core Clock Speed | 975 MHz | 1,295 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,500 MHz | -- |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | RTX A5500 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 144 GPixel/s | 20.72 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 348 GTexel/s | 41.44 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 22.27 TFLOPS | 1.66 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 348 GFLOPS | 103.6 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | RTX A5500 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.7 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.