NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450

VS
Performance
RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)119% better
18,05817% of 104,598
GeForce MX450
8,2508% of 104,598

The RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) has 119% better performance than the GeForce MX450 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
No data available
GeForce MX450
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) and the GeForce MX450 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
Shop GeForce MX450
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) GPU

The RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) is a graphics card by NVIDIA. It is built on the Ampere GPU microarchitecture and is manufactured on a 8 nm process.

Memory

The RTX A2000 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,750 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 192 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RTX A2000 Mobile includes 2,560 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 893 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,687 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 80 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 80 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 20 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 95 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The RTX A2000 Mobile has the 120th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 17.26% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce MX450 GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce MX450 is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q3 2020. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU117S) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.

Memory

The MX450 has 2 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,250 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 80 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The MX450 includes 896 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,395 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,575 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 56 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 31 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The MX450 has the 202nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.89% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)GeForce MX450
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureAmpereTuring
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release Date--Q3 2020
Production Status--Active
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Horizon Forbidden West
Horizon Forbidden West
Display FPS for Skull & Bones
Skull & Bones
Display FPS for Assassin's Creed Mirage
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Display FPS for EA Sports FC 24
EA Sports FC 24
Display FPS for Counter-Strike 2
Counter-Strike 2
Display FPS for Baldur's Gate 3
Baldur's Gate 3

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 24
F1 24
RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)GeForce MX450
Low - 1080p
--
32 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
26 FPS
High - 1080p
--
20 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
13 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) orGeForce MX450
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce MX45013.4
RTX A500 Mobile11.7-13%
Radeon 680M7.41-45%
Radeon 660M5.6-58%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) orGeForce MX450
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)119% better
18,05817% of 104,598
GeForce MX450
8,2508% of 104,598

The RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) has 119% better performance than the GeForce MX450 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) is ranked 120th with a score of 18,058, and the GeForce MX450 is ranked 202nd with a score of 8,250.

Performance per dollar
RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
No data available
GeForce MX450
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) and the GeForce MX450 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) orGeForce MX450
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)GeForce MX450
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
5,016
(+164%)
1,900
3DMark Time Spy Score
5,523
(+163.13%)
2,099
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
60,336
(+118.85%)
27,570
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
13,157
(+178.46%)
4,725
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
--
20,743.5
3DMark 11 Performance Score
17,348
(+115.02%)
8,068
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
311
(+139.23%)
130
PassMark G3D Mark
10,944
(+193.17%)
3,733
PassMark G2D Mark
536
(+76.32%)
304
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
--
57.2
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
--
53.9
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)GeForce MX450
Codename--TU117S
ArchitectureAmpereTuring
Process Size8 nm12 nm
Transistors--4,700 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)GeForce MX450
Memory Size8 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth192 Gb/s80 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,750 MHz1,250 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit64 bit
L1 Cache--64 KB
L2 Cache--512 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)GeForce MX450
Bus Interface--PCIe 4.0 x4
Thermal Design Power (TDP)95 W31 W
Outputs--Device Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)GeForce MX450
CUDA Cores2,560896
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--14
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)8056
Render Output Units (ROP)3232
Tensor Cores80--
Ray Tracing Cores20--
Core Clock Speed893 MHz1,395 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,687 MHz1,575 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)GeForce MX450
Pixel Fill Rate--50.4 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate--88.2 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance9.3 TFLOPS2.82 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance--88.2 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)GeForce MX450
DirectX--12 (12_1)
OpenCL--3.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.76.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.