NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) vs AMD Radeon R9 M385X

VS
Performance
RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)227% better
18,05817% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M385X
5,514.55% of 104,598

The RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) has 227% better performance than the Radeon R9 M385X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
No data available
Radeon R9 M385X
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) and the Radeon R9 M385X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
Shop Radeon R9 M385X
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) GPU

The RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) is a graphics card by NVIDIA. It is built on the Ampere GPU microarchitecture and is manufactured on a 8 nm process.

Memory

The RTX A2000 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,750 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 192 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RTX A2000 Mobile includes 2,560 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 893 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,687 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 80 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 80 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 20 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 95 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The RTX A2000 Mobile has the 120th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 17.26% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon R9 M385X GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 M385X is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Strato) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 M385X has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,200 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 76.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 M385X includes 896 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,100 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 56 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The R9 M385X has the 234th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.27% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)Radeon R9 M385X
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureAmpereGCN 2.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release Date--Q2 2015
Production Status--End-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)Radeon R9 M385X
Low - 768p
--
39 FPS
Medium - 768p
--
35 FPS
High - 1080p
--
20 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
15 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) orRadeon R9 M385X
GPUFrames Per Second
Radeon Pro 45518.3+20%
GeForce MX15018+18%
GeForce GTX 950M17+12%
GeForce GTX 850M17+12%
Radeon R9 M280X16.6+9%
Radeon R9 M385X15.2
GeForce MX13013-14%
Radeon RX 540 Mobile13-14%
Quadro M600M12.7-16%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) orRadeon R9 M385X
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)227% better
18,05817% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M385X
5,514.55% of 104,598

The RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) has 227% better performance than the Radeon R9 M385X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) is ranked 120th with a score of 18,058, and the Radeon R9 M385X is ranked 234th with a score of 5,514.5.

Performance per dollar
RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
No data available
Radeon R9 M385X
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) and the Radeon R9 M385X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) orRadeon R9 M385X
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)Radeon R9 M385X
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
5,016
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
5,523
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
60,336
(+167.64%)
22,544
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
13,157
(+286.46%)
3,404.5
3DMark 11 Performance Score
17,348
(+289.27%)
4,456.5
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
311
(+594.2%)
44.8
PassMark G3D Mark
10,944
(+448.85%)
1,994
PassMark G2D Mark
536
(+100.75%)
267
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)Radeon R9 M385X
Codename--Strato
ArchitectureAmpereGCN 2.0
Process Size8 nm28 nm
Transistors--2,080 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)Radeon R9 M385X
Memory Size8 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth192 Gb/s76.8 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,750 MHz1,200 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit128 bit
L1 Cache--16 KB
L2 Cache--256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)Radeon R9 M385X
Bus Interface--PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)95 W75 W
Outputs--Device Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)Radeon R9 M385X
Stream Processors (SP)--896
CUDA Cores2,560--
Compute Units (CU)--14
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)8056
Render Output Units (ROP)3216
Tensor Cores80--
Ray Tracing Cores20--
Core Clock Speed893 MHz1,000 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,687 MHz1,100 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)Radeon R9 M385X
Pixel Fill Rate--17.6 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate--61.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance9.3 TFLOPS1.97 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance--123.2 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)Radeon R9 M385X
DirectX--12 (12_0)
OpenCL--2.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.76.5

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.