NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs Intel Arc A730M
The Arc A730M has 61% better performance than the RTX A2000 Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the RTX A2000 Mobile and the Arc A730M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile GPU
The RTX A2000 Mobile is a mobile graphics card by NVIDIA. It launched in Q2 2021. Its GA106 chip that powers the GPU uses the Ampere architecture and is fabricated on the 8 nm process.
Memory
This GPU is paired with 4 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. Its 1,500 MHz memory clock and 128 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 192 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
Compatibility
This mobile card has a TDP of 95 W.
Benchmark Performance
The RTX A2000 Mobile has the 118th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 17.21% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the Intel Arc A730M GPU
The Arc A730M is a mobile graphics card by Intel. It launched in 2022. Its DG2-512 chip that powers the GPU uses the Generation 12.7 architecture and is fabricated on the 6 nm process.
Memory
This GPU is paired with 12 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. Its 1,750 MHz memory clock and 192 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 336 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
Compatibility
This mobile card has a TDP of 80 W.
Benchmark Performance
The Arc A730M has the 79th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 27.77% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | RTX A2000 Mobile | Arc A730M |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | Intel |
| Architecture | Ampere | Generation 12.7 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q2 2021 | 2022 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
F1 24 | RTX A2000 Mobile | Arc A730M |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 162 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 140 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 106 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 32 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | 21 FPS |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 3080 (Mobile) | 38.7 | +82% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile | 38.1 | +79% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | 36 | +69% |
| GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | 28 | +31% |
| Radeon RX 7600S | 24 | +13% |
| Arc A730M | 21.3 | |
| Radeon RX 7600M XT | 17.7 | -17% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Arc A730M has 61% better performance than the RTX A2000 Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The RTX A2000 Mobile is ranked 118th with a score of 18,058, and the Arc A730M is ranked 79th with a score of 29,144.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the RTX A2000 Mobile and the Arc A730M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max-Q | 29,636.5 | +64% |
| RTX 3000 Ada Generation (Mobile) | 29,411 | +63% |
| Arc A730M | 29,144 | +61% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (Mobile) | 29,092.5 | +61% |
| GeForce GTX 1080 (Mobile) | 28,526.5 | +58% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q | 19,778.5 | +10% |
| GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | 18,688 | +3% |
| RTX A2000 Mobile | 18,058 | |
| RTX A2000 (Mobile, 8 GB) | 18,058 | 0% |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile | 18,057 | -0% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | RTX A2000 Mobile | Arc A730M |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 5,016 | 8,813 (+75.7%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 5,523 | 8,919.5 (+61.5%) |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 60,336 | 83,396 (+38.22%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 13,157 | 21,294 (+61.85%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 17,348 | 24,285.5 (+39.99%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 311 (+58.35%) | 196.4 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 9,967 | 10,488 (+5.23%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 483 | 691 (+43.06%) |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | RTX A2000 Mobile | Arc A730M |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GA106 | DG2-512 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Size | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Transistors | 12,000 million | 21,700 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | RTX A2000 Mobile | Arc A730M |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 Gb/s | 336 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,500 MHz | 1,750 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 128 bit | 192 bit |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 4.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | RTX A2000 Mobile | Arc A730M |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 W | 80 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | RTX A2000 Mobile | Arc A730M |
|---|---|---|
| Shading Units | -- | 3,072 |
| CUDA Cores | 2,560 | -- |
| Execution Units (EU) | -- | 3,072 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 20 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 80 | 192 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 48 | 96 |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 384 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 24 |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,215 MHz | 1,100 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,687 MHz | 2,050 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | RTX A2000 Mobile | Arc A730M |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 80.98 GPixel/s | 196.8 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 135 GTexel/s | 393.6 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 8.64 TFLOPS | 12.6 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 135 GFLOPS | -- |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | RTX A2000 Mobile | Arc A730M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.6 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
vs
NVIDIA RTX A2000 (Mobile, 8 GB)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (Mobile)
vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti MobileNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (Mobile)
vs
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XTNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max-QNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
vs
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation (Mobile)
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.