NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro 460

VS
Performance
RTX A2000 Mobile168% better
18,05817% of 104,598
Radeon Pro 460
6,7496% of 104,598

The RTX A2000 Mobile has 168% better performance than the Radeon Pro 460 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
RTX A2000 Mobile
No data available
Radeon Pro 460
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the RTX A2000 Mobile and the Radeon Pro 460 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop RTX A2000 Mobile
Shop Radeon Pro 460
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile GPU

The NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2021. It is built on the Ampere GPU microarchitecture (codename GA106) and is manufactured on a 8 nm process.

Memory

The RTX A2000 Mobile has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 192 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RTX A2000 Mobile includes 2,560 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,215 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,687 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 80 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 48 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 80 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 20 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 95 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The RTX A2000 Mobile has the 120th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 17.26% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon Pro 460 GPU

The AMD Radeon Pro 460 is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q4 2016. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Baffin) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Pro 460 has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,270 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 81.28 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Pro 460 includes 1,024 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 850 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 907 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 35 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Pro 460 has the 222nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 6.45% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRTX A2000 MobileRadeon Pro 460
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureAmpereGCN 4.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2021Q4 2016
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt (4.0)
The Witcher 3 (4.0)
Display FPS for Need for Speed Unbound
NFS Unbound
Display FPS for The Callisto Protocol
The Callisto Protocol
Display FPS for Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Spider-man: Miles Morales
Display FPS for Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (2022)
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (2022)
Display FPS for UNCHARTED: Legacy of Thieves Collection
UNCHARTED: Legacy of Thieves Collection
Display FPS for A Plague Tale: Requiem
A Plague Tale: Requiem

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt (4.0)
The Witcher 3 (4.0)
RTX A2000 MobileRadeon Pro 460
Low - 1080p
123 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
107 FPS
--
High - 1080p
86 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
67 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:RTX A2000 Mobile orRadeon Pro 460

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:RTX A2000 Mobile orRadeon Pro 460
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
RTX A2000 Mobile168% better
18,05817% of 104,598
Radeon Pro 460
6,7496% of 104,598

The RTX A2000 Mobile has 168% better performance than the Radeon Pro 460 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The RTX A2000 Mobile is ranked 120th with a score of 18,058, and the Radeon Pro 460 is ranked 222nd with a score of 6,749.

Performance per dollar
RTX A2000 Mobile
No data available
Radeon Pro 460
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the RTX A2000 Mobile and the Radeon Pro 460 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:RTX A2000 Mobile or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:RTX A2000 Mobile orRadeon Pro 460
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRTX A2000 MobileRadeon Pro 460
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
5,016
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
5,523
(+301.97%)
1,374
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
60,336
(+122.94%)
27,064
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
13,157
(+187.02%)
4,584
3DMark 11 Performance Score
17,348
(+149.15%)
6,963
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
311
(+171.14%)
114.7
PassMark G3D Mark
9,942
(+187.92%)
3,453
PassMark G2D Mark
480
680
(+41.67%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRTX A2000 MobileRadeon Pro 460
CodenameGA106Baffin
ArchitectureAmpereGCN 4.0
Process Size8 nm14 nm
Transistors12,000 million3,000 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRTX A2000 MobileRadeon Pro 460
Memory Size4 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth192 Gb/s81.28 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,500 MHz1,270 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit128 bit
L1 Cache128 KB16 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRTX A2000 MobileRadeon Pro 460
Bus InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)95 W35 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRTX A2000 MobileRadeon Pro 460
Stream Processors (SP)--1,024
CUDA Cores2,560--
Compute Units (CU)--16
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)20--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)8064
Render Output Units (ROP)4816
Tensor Cores80--
Ray Tracing Cores20--
Core Clock Speed1,215 MHz850 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,687 MHz907 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRTX A2000 MobileRadeon Pro 460
Pixel Fill Rate80.98 GPixel/s14.51 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate135 GTexel/s58.05 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance8.64 TFLOPS1.86 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance135 GFLOPS116.1 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRTX A2000 MobileRadeon Pro 460
DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
OpenCL3.02.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.