NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon 680M

VS
Performance
RTX A2000 Mobile74% better
18,05817% of 104,598
Radeon 680M
10,37110% of 104,598

The RTX A2000 Mobile has 74% better performance than the Radeon 680M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
RTX A2000 Mobile
No data available
Radeon 680M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the RTX A2000 Mobile and the Radeon 680M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop RTX A2000 Mobile
Shop Radeon 680M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile GPU

The NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2021. It is built on the Ampere GPU microarchitecture (codename GA106) and is manufactured on a 8 nm process.

Memory

The RTX A2000 Mobile has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 192 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RTX A2000 Mobile includes 2,560 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,215 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,687 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 80 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 48 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 80 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 20 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 95 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The RTX A2000 Mobile has the 120th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 17.26% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon 680M GPU

The AMD Radeon 680M is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2022. It is built on the RDNA 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Rembrandt) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 680M includes 768 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 2,000 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,200 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 12 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The 680M has the 176th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.92% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRTX A2000 MobileRadeon 680M
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureAmpereRDNA 2.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2021Q1 2022
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Display FPS for Alan Wake 2
Alan Wake 2
Display FPS for Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Display FPS for Total War: PHARAOH
Total War: PHARAOH
Display FPS for Assassin's Creed Mirage
Assassin's Creed Mirage

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 24
F1 24
RTX A2000 MobileRadeon 680M
Low - 1080p
--
55 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
46 FPS
High - 1080p
--
34 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
7 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:RTX A2000 Mobile orRadeon 680M
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce MX45013.4+81%
RTX A500 Mobile11.7+58%
Radeon 680M7.41
Radeon 660M5.6-24%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:RTX A2000 Mobile orRadeon 680M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
RTX A2000 Mobile74% better
18,05817% of 104,598
Radeon 680M
10,37110% of 104,598

The RTX A2000 Mobile has 74% better performance than the Radeon 680M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The RTX A2000 Mobile is ranked 120th with a score of 18,058, and the Radeon 680M is ranked 176th with a score of 10,371.

Performance per dollar
RTX A2000 Mobile
No data available
Radeon 680M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the RTX A2000 Mobile and the Radeon 680M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:RTX A2000 Mobile or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q19,778.5+10%
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q18,688+3%
RTX A2000 Mobile18,058
RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)18,0580%
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile18,057-0%
Radeon Pro Vega 1610,569-41%
T600 Mobile10,498-42%
Radeon 680M10,371-43%
Quadro M4000M10,259-43%
GeForce MX55010,005-45%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:RTX A2000 Mobile orRadeon 680M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRTX A2000 MobileRadeon 680M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
5,016
(+117.8%)
2,303
3DMark Time Spy Score
5,523
(+114.07%)
2,580
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
60,336
(+39.59%)
43,225
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
13,157
(+91.65%)
6,865
3DMark 11 Performance Score
17,348
(+68%)
10,326
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
311
(+115.08%)
144.6
PassMark G3D Mark
9,942
--
PassMark G2D Mark
480
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRTX A2000 MobileRadeon 680M
CodenameGA106Rembrandt
ArchitectureAmpereRDNA 2.0
Process Size8 nm6 nm
Transistors12,000 million13,100 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRTX A2000 MobileRadeon 680M
Memory Size4 GBSystem Shared
Memory TypeGDDR6System Shared
Memory Bandwidth192 Gb/sSystem Dependent
Memory Clock1,500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory Interface128 bitSystem Shared
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRTX A2000 MobileRadeon 680M
Bus InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)95 W50 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRTX A2000 MobileRadeon 680M
Stream Processors (SP)--768
CUDA Cores2,560--
Compute Units (CU)--12
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)20--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)8048
Render Output Units (ROP)4832
Tensor Cores80--
Ray Accelerators--12
Ray Tracing Cores20--
Core Clock Speed1,215 MHz2,000 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,687 MHz2,200 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRTX A2000 MobileRadeon 680M
Pixel Fill Rate80.98 GPixel/s70.4 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate135 GTexel/s105.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance8.64 TFLOPS3.38 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance135 GFLOPS211.2 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRTX A2000 MobileRadeon 680M
DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL3.02.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.