PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

NVIDIA
VS
NVIDIA
Performance
RTX A1000 Mobile107% better
15,134.514% of 104,737
GeForce GTX 965M
7,3227% of 104,737

The RTX A1000 Mobile has 107% better performance than the GeForce GTX 965M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
RTX A1000 Mobile
No data available
GeForce GTX 965M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the RTX A1000 Mobile and the GeForce GTX 965M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop RTX A1000 Mobile
Shop GeForce GTX 965M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile GPU

The NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2022. It is built on the Ampere GPU microarchitecture (codename GA107) and is manufactured on a 8 nm process.

Memory

The RTX A1000 Mobile has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,375 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 176 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RTX A1000 Mobile includes 2,048 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 630 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,140 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 64 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 16 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 60 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The RTX A1000 Mobile has the 144th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 14.45% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2015. It is built on the Maxwell 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GM204) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 965M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,253 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 80.19 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 965M includes 1,024 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 924 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 950 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 965M has the 215th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 6.99% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRTX A1000 MobileGeForce GTX 965M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureAmpereMaxwell 2.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2022Q1 2015
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty
Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty
Display FPS for F1 23
F1 23
Display FPS for Far Cry 6
Far Cry 6
Display FPS for Cyberpunk 2077 (1.6)
Cyberpunk 2077 (1.6)
Display FPS for EA Sports F1 22
EA Sports F1 22
Display FPS for God of War
God of War
Display FPS for Marvel's Guardians of the Galaxy
Guardians of the Galaxy

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty
Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty
RTX A1000 MobileGeForce GTX 965M
Low - 1080p
66 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
50 FPS
--
High - 1080p
42 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
35 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:RTX A1000 Mobile orGeForce GTX 965M

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:RTX A1000 Mobile orGeForce GTX 965M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
RTX A1000 Mobile107% better
15,134.514% of 104,737
GeForce GTX 965M
7,3227% of 104,737

The RTX A1000 Mobile has 107% better performance than the GeForce GTX 965M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The RTX A1000 Mobile is ranked 144th with a score of 15,134.5, and the GeForce GTX 965M is ranked 215th with a score of 7,322.

Performance per dollar
RTX A1000 Mobile
No data available
GeForce GTX 965M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the RTX A1000 Mobile and the GeForce GTX 965M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:RTX A1000 Mobile or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:RTX A1000 Mobile orGeForce GTX 965M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRTX A1000 MobileGeForce GTX 965M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
4,255.5
(+135.11%)
1,810
3DMark Time Spy Score
4,696.5
(+140.6%)
1,952
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
70,880
(+103.98%)
34,748
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
11,321
(+104.5%)
5,536
3DMark 11 Performance Score
15,496.5
(+96.26%)
7,896
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
254
(+170.5%)
93.9
PassMark G3D Mark
9,469
(+149.71%)
3,792
PassMark G2D Mark
525
(+58.13%)
332
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
--
66.3
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRTX A1000 MobileGeForce GTX 965M
CodenameGA107GM204
ArchitectureAmpereMaxwell 2.0
Process Size8 nm28 nm
Transistors8,700 million5,200 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRTX A1000 MobileGeForce GTX 965M
Memory Size4 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth176 Gb/s80.19 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,375 MHz1,253 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit128 bit
L1 Cache128 KB48 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRTX A1000 MobileGeForce GTX 965M
Bus InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8MXM-B (3.0)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)60 W50 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRTX A1000 MobileGeForce GTX 965M
CUDA Cores2,0481,024
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)16--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)6464
Render Output Units (ROP)3232
Tensor Cores64--
Ray Tracing Cores16--
Core Clock Speed630 MHz924 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,140 MHz950 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRTX A1000 MobileGeForce GTX 965M
Pixel Fill Rate36.48 GPixel/s30.4 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate72.96 GTexel/s60.8 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance4.67 TFLOPS1.95 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance72.96 GFLOPS60.8 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRTX A1000 MobileGeForce GTX 965M
DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.