NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation (Mobile) vs NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation (Mobile)
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation (Mobile) has 3% better performance than the RTX 3000 Ada Generation (Mobile) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the RTX 2000 Ada Generation (Mobile) and the RTX 3000 Ada Generation (Mobile) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation (Mobile) GPU
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation (Mobile) is a mobile graphics card by NVIDIA. It launched in Q1 2023. Its AD107 chip that powers the GPU uses the Ada Lovelace architecture and is fabricated on the 5 nm process.
This GPU is paired with 8 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. Its 2,000 MHz memory clock and 128 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 256 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
This mobile card has a TDP of 50 W.
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation (Mobile) has the 74th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 28.84% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation (Mobile) GPU
The RTX 3000 Ada Generation (Mobile) is a mobile graphics card by NVIDIA. It launched in Q1 2023. Its AD106 chip that powers the GPU uses the Ada Lovelace architecture and is fabricated on the 5 nm process.
This GPU is paired with 8 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. Its 2,000 MHz memory clock and 128 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 256 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
This mobile card has a TDP of 115 W.
The RTX 3000 Ada Generation (Mobile) has the 77th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 28.03% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | RTX 2000 Ada Generation (Mobile) | RTX 3000 Ada Generation (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q1 2023 | Q1 2023 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Benchmark Performance
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation (Mobile) has 3% better performance than the RTX 3000 Ada Generation (Mobile) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation (Mobile) is ranked 74th with a score of 30,262, and the RTX 3000 Ada Generation (Mobile) is ranked 77th with a score of 29,411.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the RTX 2000 Ada Generation (Mobile) and the RTX 3000 Ada Generation (Mobile) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 6650M | 32,846 | +9% |
| Radeon RX 6700S | 32,662 | +8% |
| Radeon RX 6600M | 31,868 | +5% |
| GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | 30,620 | +1% |
| RTX 2000 Ada Generation (Mobile) | 30,262 | |
| GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max-Q | 29,636.5 | -2% |
| RTX 3000 Ada Generation (Mobile) | 29,411 | -3% |
| Arc A730M | 29,144 | -4% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (Mobile) | 29,092.5 | -4% |
| GeForce GTX 1080 (Mobile) | 28,526.5 | -6% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | RTX 2000 Ada Generation (Mobile) | RTX 3000 Ada Generation (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 8,433 (+0.98%) | 8,351 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 8,849 (+0.43%) | 8,811 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 22,039 (+5.41%) | 20,908 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 27,558 (+1.75%) | 27,083 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 295 (+2.43%) | 288 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 15,579 | 18,570 (+19.2%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 602 | 806 (+33.89%) |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | RTX 2000 Ada Generation (Mobile) | RTX 3000 Ada Generation (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | AD107 | AD106 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Size | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistors | 18,900 million | 22,900 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | RTX 2000 Ada Generation (Mobile) | RTX 3000 Ada Generation (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 Gb/s | 256 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 2,000 MHz | 2,000 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB | 32 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | RTX 2000 Ada Generation (Mobile) | RTX 3000 Ada Generation (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 W | 115 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | RTX 2000 Ada Generation (Mobile) | RTX 3000 Ada Generation (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| CUDA Cores | 3,072 | 4,608 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 24 | 36 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 96 | 144 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 48 | 48 |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 144 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 36 |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,635 MHz | 1,395 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 2,115 MHz | 1,695 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | RTX 2000 Ada Generation (Mobile) | RTX 3000 Ada Generation (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 101.5 GPixel/s | 81.36 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 203 GTexel/s | 244.1 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 12.99 TFLOPS | 15.62 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 203 GFLOPS | 244.1 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | RTX 2000 Ada Generation (Mobile) | RTX 3000 Ada Generation (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.