NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

VS
Performance
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile2,626% better
30,26229% of 104,598
GeForce GT 635M
1,1101% of 104,598

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has 2,626% better performance than the GeForce GT 635M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
No data available
GeForce GT 635M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile and the GeForce GT 635M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Shop GeForce GT 635M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile GPU

The NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2023. It is built on the Ada Lovelace GPU microarchitecture (codename AD107) and is manufactured on a 5 nm process.

Memory

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 2,000 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 256 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile includes 3,072 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,635 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,115 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 96 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 48 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 96 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 24 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has the 74th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 28.93% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2012. It is built on the Fermi GPU microarchitecture (codename GF108) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.

Memory

The GT 635M has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 28.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GT 635M includes 96 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 660 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 753 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 4 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 35 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GT 635M has the 445th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.06% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRTX 2000 Ada Generation MobileGeForce GT 635M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureAda LovelaceFermi
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2023Q1 2012
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
CS: GO

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
CS: GO
RTX 2000 Ada Generation MobileGeForce GT 635M
Low - 768p
--
167 FPS
Medium - 768p
--
117 FPS
High - 768p
--
82 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
36 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile orGeForce GT 635M
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce GT 730M52+45%
Radeon HD 7670M46+28%
Radeon R7 M36043.8+22%
GeForce GT 630M38+6%
Radeon HD 7610M38+6%
GeForce GT 635M35.9
Radeon 53035.5-1%
GeForce 910M29.7-17%
Radeon R5 M33526.4-26%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile orGeForce GT 635M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile2,626% better
30,26229% of 104,598
GeForce GT 635M
1,1101% of 104,598

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has 2,626% better performance than the GeForce GT 635M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is ranked 74th with a score of 30,262, and the GeForce GT 635M is ranked 445th with a score of 1,110.

Performance per dollar
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
No data available
GeForce GT 635M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile and the GeForce GT 635M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile orGeForce GT 635M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRTX 2000 Ada Generation MobileGeForce GT 635M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
8,433
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
8,849
--
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
22,039
--
3DMark 11 Performance Score
27,558
(+2,153.31%)
1,223
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
295
--
PassMark G3D Mark
15,579
(+2,681.96%)
560
PassMark G2D Mark
602
(+254.12%)
170
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRTX 2000 Ada Generation MobileGeForce GT 635M
CodenameAD107GF108
ArchitectureAda LovelaceFermi
Process Size5 nm40 nm
Transistors18,900 million585 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRTX 2000 Ada Generation MobileGeForce GT 635M
Memory Size8 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6DDR3
Memory Bandwidth256 Gb/s28.8 Gb/s
Memory Clock2,000 MHz900 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit128 bit
L1 Cache128 KB64 KB
L2 Cache12 MB256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRTX 2000 Ada Generation MobileGeForce GT 635M
Bus InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)50 W35 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRTX 2000 Ada Generation MobileGeForce GT 635M
CUDA Cores3,07296
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)242
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)9616
Render Output Units (ROP)484
Tensor Cores96--
Ray Tracing Cores24--
Core Clock Speed1,635 MHz660 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)2,115 MHz753 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRTX 2000 Ada Generation MobileGeForce GT 635M
Pixel Fill Rate101.5 GPixel/s1.9 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate203 GTexel/s7.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance12.99 TFLOPS182.4 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance203 GFLOPS15.2 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRTX 2000 Ada Generation MobileGeForce GT 635M
DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_0)
OpenCL3.01.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.75.1

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.