NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs AMD Radeon R7 M270

VS
Performance
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile1,529% better
30,26229% of 104,598
Radeon R7 M270
1,857.52% of 104,598

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has 1,529% better performance than the Radeon R7 M270 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
No data available
Radeon R7 M270
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile and the Radeon R7 M270 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Shop Radeon R7 M270
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile GPU

The NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2023. It is built on the Ada Lovelace GPU microarchitecture (codename AD107) and is manufactured on a 5 nm process.

Memory

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 2,000 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 256 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile includes 3,072 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,635 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,115 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 96 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 48 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 96 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 24 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has the 74th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 28.93% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon R7 M270 GPU

The AMD Radeon R7 M270 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2014. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Opal) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R7 M270 has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 28.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R7 M270 includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 725 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 825 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Benchmark Performance

The R7 M270 has the 370th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.78% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRTX 2000 Ada Generation MobileRadeon R7 M270
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureAda LovelaceGCN 1.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2023Q1 2014
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Grand Theft Auto V
GTA V

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Grand Theft Auto V
GTA V
RTX 2000 Ada Generation MobileRadeon R7 M270
Low - 768p
--
51 FPS
Medium - 768p
--
44 FPS
High - 1080p
--
12 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
8 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile orRadeon R7 M270
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce 830M9.3+15%
Radeon R7 M2708.1
GeForce GT 750M7.3-10%
Radeon 5307.1-12%
GeForce MX1106.7-17%
GeForce 930M5.7-30%
Radeon R5 M2555.32-34%
GeForce GT 740M3.9-52%
GeForce GT 640M3-63%
GeForce 920M2.3-72%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile orRadeon R7 M270
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile1,529% better
30,26229% of 104,598
Radeon R7 M270
1,857.52% of 104,598

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has 1,529% better performance than the Radeon R7 M270 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is ranked 74th with a score of 30,262, and the Radeon R7 M270 is ranked 370th with a score of 1,857.5.

Performance per dollar
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
No data available
Radeon R7 M270
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile and the Radeon R7 M270 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile orRadeon R7 M270
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRTX 2000 Ada Generation MobileRadeon R7 M270
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
8,433
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
8,849
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
--
6,364.5
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
22,039
(+1,651.91%)
1,258
3DMark 11 Performance Score
27,558
(+1,268.32%)
2,014
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
295
(+688.77%)
37.4
PassMark G3D Mark
15,579
(+1,931.16%)
767
PassMark G2D Mark
602
(+288.39%)
155
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
--
23.9
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
--
21.1
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRTX 2000 Ada Generation MobileRadeon R7 M270
CodenameAD107Opal
ArchitectureAda LovelaceGCN 1.0
Process Size5 nm28 nm
Transistors18,900 million950 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRTX 2000 Ada Generation MobileRadeon R7 M270
Memory Size8 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6DDR3
Memory Bandwidth256 Gb/s28.8 Gb/s
Memory Clock2,000 MHz900 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit128 bit
L1 Cache128 KB16 KB
L2 Cache12 MB256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRTX 2000 Ada Generation MobileRadeon R7 M270
Bus InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)50 W--
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRTX 2000 Ada Generation MobileRadeon R7 M270
Stream Processors (SP)--384
CUDA Cores3,072--
Compute Units (CU)--6
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)24--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)9624
Render Output Units (ROP)488
Tensor Cores96--
Ray Tracing Cores24--
Core Clock Speed1,635 MHz725 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)2,115 MHz825 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRTX 2000 Ada Generation MobileRadeon R7 M270
Pixel Fill Rate101.5 GPixel/s6.6 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate203 GTexel/s19.8 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance12.99 TFLOPS633.6 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance203 GFLOPS--

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRTX 2000 Ada Generation MobileRadeon R7 M270
DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_1)
OpenCL3.02.1 (1.2)
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.76.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.