NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs AMD Radeon 660M
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has 355% better performance than the Radeon 660M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile and the Radeon 660M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile GPU
The NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2023. It is built on the Ada Lovelace GPU microarchitecture (codename AD107) and is manufactured on a 5 nm process.
Memory
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 2,000 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 256 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile includes 3,072 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,635 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,115 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 96 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 48 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 96 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 24 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has the 74th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 28.89% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD Radeon 660M GPU
The AMD Radeon 660M is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2022. It is built on the RDNA 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Rembrandt) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The 660M includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,500 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,900 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 6 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 40 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The 660M has the 224th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 6.35% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon 660M |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q1 2023 | Q1 2022 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
F1 24 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon 660M |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 32 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 27 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 20 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce MX450 | 20.4 | +3% |
| Radeon 660M | 19.8 | |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has 355% better performance than the Radeon 660M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is ranked 74th with a score of 30,262, and the Radeon 660M is ranked 224th with a score of 6,651.5.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile and the Radeon 660M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 6600M | 31,868 | +5% |
| GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | 30,465 | +1% |
| RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | 30,262 | |
| GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max-Q | 29,636.5 | -2% |
| RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile | 29,411 | -3% |
| Radeon Pro 460 | 6,749 | -78% |
| GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) | 6,736 | -78% |
| Radeon 660M | 6,651.5 | -78% |
| GeForce MX350 | 6,166 | -80% |
| GeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition) | 6,071 | -80% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon 660M |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 8,433 (+453.71%) | 1,523 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 8,849 (+420.53%) | 1,700 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | -- | 31,180 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 22,039 (+365.5%) | 4,734.5 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 27,558 (+293.49%) | 7,003.5 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 295 (+146.45%) | 119.7 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 15,579 | -- |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 602 | -- |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon 660M |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | AD107 | Rembrandt |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Size | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Transistors | 18,900 million | 13,100 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon 660M |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 8 GB | System Shared |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | System Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 Gb/s | System Dependent |
| Memory Clock | 2,000 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory Interface | 128 bit | System Shared |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB | 2 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon 660M |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 W | 40 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon 660M |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 384 |
| CUDA Cores | 3,072 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 6 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 24 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 96 | 24 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 48 | 16 |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | -- |
| Ray Accelerators | -- | 6 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | -- |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,635 MHz | 1,500 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 2,115 MHz | 1,900 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon 660M |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 101.5 GPixel/s | 30.4 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 203 GTexel/s | 45.6 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 12.99 TFLOPS | 1,459 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 203 GFLOPS | 91.2 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon 660M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.