NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M

VS
Performance
Quadro T2000 Mobile633% better
13,523.513% of 104,598
GeForce GT 645M
1,844.52% of 104,598

The Quadro T2000 Mobile has 633% better performance than the GeForce GT 645M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Quadro T2000 Mobile
No data available
GeForce GT 645M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro T2000 Mobile and the GeForce GT 645M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Quadro T2000 Mobile
Shop GeForce GT 645M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2019. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU117) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.

Memory

The T2000 Mobile has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 2,001 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 128.1 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The T2000 Mobile includes 1,024 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,575 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,785 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 60 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The T2000 Mobile has the 152nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 12.93% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q4 2012. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GT 645M has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 28.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GT 645M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 709 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 780 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 32 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GT 645M has the 372nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.76% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoQuadro T2000 MobileGeForce GT 645M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureTuringKepler
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2019Q4 2012
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Display FPS for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
CS: GO

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Quadro T2000 MobileGeForce GT 645M
Low - 720p
--
84 FPS
Medium - 768p
--
47 FPS
High - 768p
--
40 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
14 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro T2000 Mobile orGeForce GT 645M
GPUFrames Per Second
Radeon R9 M37516.3+14%
Quadro K1100M15.4+8%
GeForce 940M15+5%
Quadro K620M15+5%
GeForce 920MX15+5%
GeForce GT 645M14.3
GeForce GT 640M14.3+0%
GeForce 840M14-2%
Radeon R7 M44513.8-3%
Radeon R7 M260X13.5-6%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro T2000 Mobile orGeForce GT 645M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Quadro T2000 Mobile633% better
13,523.513% of 104,598
GeForce GT 645M
1,844.52% of 104,598

The Quadro T2000 Mobile has 633% better performance than the GeForce GT 645M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Quadro T2000 Mobile is ranked 152nd with a score of 13,523.5, and the GeForce GT 645M is ranked 372nd with a score of 1,844.5.

Performance per dollar
Quadro T2000 Mobile
No data available
GeForce GT 645M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro T2000 Mobile and the GeForce GT 645M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro T2000 Mobile or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Quadro T1200 Mobile14,387+6%
Radeon RX 5300M14,351+6%
Quadro T2000 Mobile13,523.5
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q13,333.5-1%
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile13,266-2%
Radeon R7 M2701,857.5-86%
GeForce GT 740M1,848-86%
GeForce GT 645M1,844.5-86%
GeForce 920MX1,835-86%
Quadro K1100M1,826.5-86%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro T2000 Mobile orGeForce GT 645M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkQuadro T2000 MobileGeForce GT 645M
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
--
8,654.5
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
--
1,151.5
3DMark 11 Performance Score
13,271
(+576.23%)
1,962.5
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
203
--
PassMark G3D Mark
7,153
(+665.85%)
934
PassMark G2D Mark
460
(+191.14%)
158
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
--
17.7
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecQuadro T2000 MobileGeForce GT 645M
CodenameTU117GK107
ArchitectureTuringKepler
Process Size12 nm28 nm
Transistors4,700 million1,270 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecQuadro T2000 MobileGeForce GT 645M
Memory Size4 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5DDR3
Memory Bandwidth128.1 Gb/s28.8 Gb/s
Memory Clock2,001 MHz900 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit128 bit
L1 Cache64 KB16 KB
L2 Cache1,024 KB256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecQuadro T2000 MobileGeForce GT 645M
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)60 W32 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecQuadro T2000 MobileGeForce GT 645M
CUDA Cores1,024384
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)162
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)6432
Render Output Units (ROP)3216
Core Clock Speed1,575 MHz709 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,785 MHz780 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecQuadro T2000 MobileGeForce GT 645M
Pixel Fill Rate57.12 GPixel/s6.24 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate114.2 GTexel/s24.96 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance3.66 TFLOPS599 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance114.2 GFLOPS24.96 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecQuadro T2000 MobileGeForce GT 645M
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.76.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.