NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)

VS
Performance
Quadro T2000 Max-Q70% better
11,46111% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
6,7366% of 104,598

The Quadro T2000 Max-Q has 70% better performance than the GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Quadro T2000 Max-Q
No data available
GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro T2000 Max-Q and the GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Shop GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2019. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU117) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.

Memory

The T2000 Max-Q has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,250 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 80 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The T2000 Max-Q includes 1,024 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,035 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,395 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 40 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The T2000 Max-Q has the 166th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 10.96% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q4 2012. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK104) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 680MX has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,250 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 160 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 680MX includes 1,536 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 719 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 719 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 128 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 122 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 680MX has the 224th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 6.44% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoQuadro T2000 Max-QGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureTuringKepler
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2019Q4 2012
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 2020
F1 2020
Display FPS for Gears Tactics
Gears Tactics
Display FPS for Doom Eternal
Doom Eternal
Display FPS for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3
Display FPS for Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Display FPS for GRID (2019)
GRID (2019)
Display FPS for Hunt: Showdown
Hunt: Showdown

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 2020
F1 2020
Quadro T2000 Max-QGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
Low - 720p
182 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
96 FPS
--
High - 1080p
78 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
55 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro T2000 Max-Q orGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro T2000 Max-Q orGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Quadro T2000 Max-Q70% better
11,46111% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
6,7366% of 104,598

The Quadro T2000 Max-Q has 70% better performance than the GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is ranked 166th with a score of 11,461, and the GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) is ranked 224th with a score of 6,736.

Performance per dollar
Quadro T2000 Max-Q
No data available
GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro T2000 Max-Q and the GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro T2000 Max-Q or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro T2000 Max-Q orGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkQuadro T2000 Max-QGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
3,094
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
3,352
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
41,106
--
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
8,261.5
--
3DMark 11 Performance Score
11,907
(+72.99%)
6,883
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
220
--
PassMark G3D Mark
6,916
(+67.13%)
4,138
PassMark G2D Mark
425
539
(+26.82%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecQuadro T2000 Max-QGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
CodenameTU117GK104
ArchitectureTuringKepler
Process Size12 nm28 nm
Transistors4,700 million3,540 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecQuadro T2000 Max-QGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
Memory Size4 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth80 Gb/s160 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,250 MHz1,250 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit256 bit
L1 Cache64 KB16 KB
L2 Cache1,024 KB512 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecQuadro T2000 Max-QGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)40 W122 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecQuadro T2000 Max-QGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
CUDA Cores1,0241,536
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)168
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)64128
Render Output Units (ROP)3232
Core Clock Speed1,035 MHz719 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,395 MHz719 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecQuadro T2000 Max-QGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
Pixel Fill Rate44.64 GPixel/s23.01 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate89.28 GTexel/s92.03 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance2.86 TFLOPS2.21 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance89.28 GFLOPS92.03 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecQuadro T2000 Max-QGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.