NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 M385X

VS
Performance
Quadro T2000 Max-Q108% better
11,46111% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M385X
5,514.55% of 104,598

The Quadro T2000 Max-Q has 108% better performance than the Radeon R9 M385X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Quadro T2000 Max-Q
No data available
Radeon R9 M385X
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro T2000 Max-Q and the Radeon R9 M385X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Shop Radeon R9 M385X
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2019. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU117) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.

Memory

The T2000 Max-Q has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,250 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 80 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The T2000 Max-Q includes 1,024 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,035 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,395 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 40 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The T2000 Max-Q has the 166th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 10.96% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon R9 M385X GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 M385X is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Strato) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 M385X has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,200 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 76.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 M385X includes 896 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,100 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 56 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The R9 M385X has the 234th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.27% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoQuadro T2000 Max-QRadeon R9 M385X
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureTuringGCN 2.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2019Q2 2015
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 2020
F1 2020
Display FPS for Gears Tactics
Gears Tactics
Display FPS for Doom Eternal
Doom Eternal
Display FPS for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3
Display FPS for Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Display FPS for GRID (2019)
GRID (2019)
Display FPS for Hunt: Showdown
Hunt: Showdown

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 2020
F1 2020
Quadro T2000 Max-QRadeon R9 M385X
Low - 720p
182 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
96 FPS
--
High - 1080p
78 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
55 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro T2000 Max-Q orRadeon R9 M385X

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro T2000 Max-Q orRadeon R9 M385X
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Quadro T2000 Max-Q108% better
11,46111% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M385X
5,514.55% of 104,598

The Quadro T2000 Max-Q has 108% better performance than the Radeon R9 M385X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is ranked 166th with a score of 11,461, and the Radeon R9 M385X is ranked 234th with a score of 5,514.5.

Performance per dollar
Quadro T2000 Max-Q
No data available
Radeon R9 M385X
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro T2000 Max-Q and the Radeon R9 M385X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro T2000 Max-Q or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Quadro M5000M11,845+3%
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q11,538+1%
Quadro T2000 Max-Q11,461
Quadro T1000 Mobile11,377-1%
Radeon HD 7970M X211,119-3%
Radeon HD 7970M5,645-51%
Radeon HD 6970M X25,541.5-52%
Radeon R9 M385X5,514.5-52%
Radeon Pro 4555,388-53%
FirePro M61005,369-53%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro T2000 Max-Q orRadeon R9 M385X
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkQuadro T2000 Max-QRadeon R9 M385X
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
3,094
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
3,352
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
41,106
(+82.34%)
22,544
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
8,261.5
(+142.66%)
3,404.5
3DMark 11 Performance Score
11,907
(+167.18%)
4,456.5
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
220
(+391.07%)
44.8
PassMark G3D Mark
6,916
(+246.84%)
1,994
PassMark G2D Mark
425
(+59.18%)
267
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecQuadro T2000 Max-QRadeon R9 M385X
CodenameTU117Strato
ArchitectureTuringGCN 2.0
Process Size12 nm28 nm
Transistors4,700 million2,080 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecQuadro T2000 Max-QRadeon R9 M385X
Memory Size4 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth80 Gb/s76.8 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,250 MHz1,200 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit128 bit
L1 Cache64 KB16 KB
L2 Cache1,024 KB256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecQuadro T2000 Max-QRadeon R9 M385X
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)40 W75 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecQuadro T2000 Max-QRadeon R9 M385X
Stream Processors (SP)--896
CUDA Cores1,024--
Compute Units (CU)--14
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)16--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)6456
Render Output Units (ROP)3216
Core Clock Speed1,035 MHz1,000 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,395 MHz1,100 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecQuadro T2000 Max-QRadeon R9 M385X
Pixel Fill Rate44.64 GPixel/s17.6 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate89.28 GTexel/s61.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance2.86 TFLOPS1.97 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance89.28 GFLOPS123.2 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecQuadro T2000 Max-QRadeon R9 M385X
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
OpenCL3.02.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.5

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.