NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

VS
Performance
Quadro T1200 Mobile258% better
14,38714% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 765M
4,0194% of 104,598

The Quadro T1200 Mobile has 258% better performance than the GeForce GTX 765M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Quadro T1200 Mobile
No data available
GeForce GTX 765M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro T1200 Mobile and the GeForce GTX 765M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Quadro T1200 Mobile
Shop GeForce GTX 765M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2021. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU117) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.

Memory

The T1200 Mobile has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 192 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The T1200 Mobile includes 1,024 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,515 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,785 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 64 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 18 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The T1200 Mobile has the 148th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 13.75% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK106) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 765M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,002 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64.13 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 765M includes 768 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 797 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 863 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 765M has the 274th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.84% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoQuadro T1200 MobileGeForce GTX 765M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureTuringKepler
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2021Q2 2013
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Display FPS for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
CS: GO

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Quadro T1200 MobileGeForce GTX 765M
Low - 720p
--
143 FPS
Medium - 768p
--
95 FPS
High - 768p
--
82 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
27 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro T1200 Mobile orGeForce GTX 765M

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro T1200 Mobile orGeForce GTX 765M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Quadro T1200 Mobile258% better
14,38714% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 765M
4,0194% of 104,598

The Quadro T1200 Mobile has 258% better performance than the GeForce GTX 765M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is ranked 148th with a score of 14,387, and the GeForce GTX 765M is ranked 274th with a score of 4,019.

Performance per dollar
Quadro T1200 Mobile
No data available
GeForce GTX 765M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro T1200 Mobile and the GeForce GTX 765M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro T1200 Mobile or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon Pro 5500M14,725+2%
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile14,693+2%
Quadro T1200 Mobile14,387
Radeon RX 5300M14,351-0%
Quadro T2000 Mobile13,523.5-6%
Quadro P5204,185.5-71%
Radeon 540X4,097-72%
GeForce GTX 765M4,019-72%
GeForce GTX 675MX3,978.5-72%
Quadro M6203,801-74%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro T1200 Mobile orGeForce GTX 765M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkQuadro T1200 MobileGeForce GTX 765M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
3,595
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
3,891
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
50,827
(+188.53%)
17,616
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
10,134
(+308.79%)
2,479
3DMark 11 Performance Score
13,779
(+237.47%)
4,083
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
216.8
(+145.53%)
88.3
PassMark G3D Mark
--
1,996
PassMark G2D Mark
--
285
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
--
35.8
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
--
27.3
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecQuadro T1200 MobileGeForce GTX 765M
CodenameTU117GK106
ArchitectureTuringKepler
Process Size12 nm28 nm
Transistors4,700 million2,540 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecQuadro T1200 MobileGeForce GTX 765M
Memory Size4 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth192 Gb/s64.13 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,500 MHz1,002 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit128 bit
L1 Cache64 KB16 KB
L2 Cache1,024 KB256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecQuadro T1200 MobileGeForce GTX 765M
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)18 W75 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecQuadro T1200 MobileGeForce GTX 765M
CUDA Cores1,024768
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)164
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)6464
Render Output Units (ROP)3216
Tensor Cores64--
Core Clock Speed1,515 MHz797 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,785 MHz863 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecQuadro T1200 MobileGeForce GTX 765M
Pixel Fill Rate57.12 GPixel/s13.81 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate114.2 GTexel/s55.23 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance3.66 TFLOPS1,326 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance114.2 GFLOPS55.23 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecQuadro T1200 MobileGeForce GTX 765M
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.76.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.