Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile809% better
24,62024% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 485M
2,7093% of 104,598
The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile has 809% better performance than the GeForce GTX 485M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
No data available
GeForce GTX 485M
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and the GeForce GTX 485M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Shop GeForce GTX 485M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile GPU
The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2019. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU104) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.
Memory
The RTX 5000 Mobile has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,750 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 448 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RTX 5000 Mobile includes 3,072 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,035 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,530 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 192 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 384 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 48 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 110 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The RTX 5000 Mobile has the 96th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 23.54% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2011. It is built on the Fermi GPU microarchitecture (codename GF104) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 485M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 750 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 96 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 485M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 575 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 100 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The GTX 485M has the 315th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.59% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | GeForce GTX 485M |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q2 2019 | Q1 2011 |
| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Doom Eternal
Borderlands 3
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
NFS Heat
Red Dead Redemption 2
Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)
GRID (2019)
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Doom Eternal | Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | GeForce GTX 485M |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | 235 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | 200 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 184 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 181 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | 129 FPS | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | 69 FPS | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile orGeForce GTX 485M
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | 89 | +30% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | 78.2 | +14% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | 76 | +11% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | 75.2 | +10% |
| Radeon RX 6800S | 73.2 | +7% |
| Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | 68.6 | |
| GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max-Q | 65 | -5% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile | 64 | -7% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | 62 | -10% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile | 61.6 | -10% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile orGeForce GTX 485M
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile809% better
24,62024% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 485M
2,7093% of 104,598
The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile has 809% better performance than the GeForce GTX 485M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is ranked 96th with a score of 24,620, and the GeForce GTX 485M is ranked 315th with a score of 2,709.
Performance per dollar
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
No data available
GeForce GTX 485M
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and the GeForce GTX 485M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | 25,370.5 | +3% |
| Quadro P5200 | 25,100 | +2% |
| Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | 24,620 | |
| Radeon RX 5600M | 24,213 | -2% |
| Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | 23,574 | -4% |
| Radeon HD 6970M | 2,818.5 | -89% |
| GeForce GT 755M | 2,800.5 | -89% |
| GeForce GTX 485M | 2,709 | -89% |
| Radeon HD 7870M | 2,702 | -89% |
| GeForce GTX 670M | 2,698 | -89% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile orGeForce GTX 485M
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | GeForce GTX 485M |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 9,332 | -- |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 9,012.5 | -- |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 117,274 | -- |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 23,034.5 | -- |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 21,068.5 (+616.13%) | 2,942 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 209.5 | -- |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 14,832 (+528.47%) | 2,360 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 696 (+43.21%) | 486 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 302.1 | -- |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL | 225.3 | -- |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | GeForce GTX 485M |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | TU104 | GF104 |
| Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
| Process Size | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Transistors | 13,600 million | 1,950 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | GeForce GTX 485M |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 Gb/s | 96 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,750 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 512 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | GeForce GTX 485M |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 W | 100 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | GeForce GTX 485M |
|---|---|---|
| CUDA Cores | 3,072 | 384 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 48 | 8 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 192 | 64 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 64 | 32 |
| Tensor Cores | 384 | -- |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | -- |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,035 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,530 MHz | -- |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | GeForce GTX 485M |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 97.92 GPixel/s | 9.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 293.8 GTexel/s | 36.8 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 9.4 TFLOPS | 883.2 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 293.8 GFLOPS | 73.6 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | GeForce GTX 485M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 5.1 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
vs
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 MobileNVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max-QNVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
vs
AMD Radeon RX 5600MNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 MobileNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
vs
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 MobileNVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max-QNVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
vs
AMD Radeon RX 5600MNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 MobileNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.