NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs AMD FirePro M6100
The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile has 359% better performance than the FirePro M6100 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and the FirePro M6100 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile GPU
The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a mobile graphics card by NVIDIA. It launched in Q2 2019. Its TU104 chip that powers the GPU uses the Turing architecture and is fabricated on the 12 nm process.
Memory
This GPU is paired with 16 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. Its 1,750 MHz memory clock and 256 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 448 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
Compatibility
This mobile card has a TDP of 110 W.
Benchmark Performance
The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile has the 96th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 23.46% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD FirePro M6100 GPU
The FirePro M6100 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card by AMD. It launched in Q4 2013. Its Saturn chip that powers the GPU uses the GCN 2.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 28 nm process.
Memory
This GPU is paired with 2 GB of GDDR5 VRAM. Its 1,375 MHz memory clock and 128 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 88 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
Benchmark Performance
The FirePro M6100 has the 235th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.12% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | FirePro M6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q2 2019 | Q4 2013 |
| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Doom Eternal | Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | FirePro M6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | 235 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | 200 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 184 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 181 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | 129 FPS | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | 69 FPS | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER (Mobile) | 89 | +30% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Ti (Mobile) | 78.2 | +14% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 (Mobile) | 76 | +11% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) | 75.2 | +10% |
| Radeon RX 6800S | 73.2 | +7% |
| Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | 68.6 | |
| GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max-Q | 65 | -5% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile | 64 | -7% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | 62 | -10% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (Mobile) | 61.6 | -10% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile has 359% better performance than the FirePro M6100 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is ranked 96th with a score of 24,620, and the FirePro M6100 is ranked 235th with a score of 5,369.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and the FirePro M6100 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | 25,370.5 | +3% |
| Quadro P5200 | 25,100 | +2% |
| Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | 24,620 | |
| Radeon RX 5600M | 24,213 | -2% |
| Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | 23,574 | -4% |
| Radeon R9 M385X | 5,514.5 | -78% |
| Radeon Pro 455 | 5,388 | -78% |
| FirePro M6100 | 5,369 | -78% |
| Quadro M1200 | 5,310 | -78% |
| Radeon Pro 560 | 5,305 | -78% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | FirePro M6100 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 9,332 | -- |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 9,012.5 | -- |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 117,274 (+362.77%) | 25,342 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 23,034.5 (+500.33%) | 3,837 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 21,068.5 (+273.62%) | 5,639 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 209.5 (+86.22%) | 112.5 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 14,832 (+598.63%) | 2,123 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 715 (+136.75%) | 302 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 302.1 (+437.54%) | 56.2 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL | 225.3 (+361.68%) | 48.8 |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | FirePro M6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | TU104 | Saturn |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Size | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 13,600 million | 2,080 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | FirePro M6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 Gb/s | 88 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,750 MHz | 1,375 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 256 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 16 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 256 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | FirePro M6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 W | -- |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | FirePro M6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 768 |
| CUDA Cores | 3,072 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 12 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 48 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 192 | 48 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 64 | 16 |
| Tensor Cores | 384 | -- |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | -- |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,035 MHz | 1,100 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,530 MHz | -- |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | FirePro M6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 97.92 GPixel/s | 17.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 293.8 GTexel/s | 51.6 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 9.4 TFLOPS | 1.65 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 293.8 GFLOPS | 103.2 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | FirePro M6100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
vs
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 MobileNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max-QAMD Radeon RX 6800S
vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti (Mobile)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)
vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 MobileNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (Mobile)
vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER (Mobile)
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.