NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

VS
Performance
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q358% better
23,57423% of 104,598
Quadro M2000M
5,1435% of 104,598

The Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q has 358% better performance than the Quadro M2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
No data available
Quadro M2000M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and the Quadro M2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Shop Quadro M2000M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2019. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU104) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.

Memory

The RTX 4000 Max-Q has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 384 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RTX 4000 Max-Q includes 2,560 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 780 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,380 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 160 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 320 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 40 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 80 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The RTX 4000 Max-Q has the 98th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 22.54% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro M2000M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q4 2015. It is built on the Maxwell GPU microarchitecture (codename GM107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The M2000M has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,253 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 80.19 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The M2000M includes 640 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,098 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,137 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 55 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The M2000M has the 247th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 4.92% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoQuadro RTX 4000 Max-QQuadro M2000M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureTuringMaxwell
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2019Q4 2015
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for X-Plane 11
X-Plane 11
Display FPS for Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
Display FPS for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Display FPS for Dota 2 - Reborn
Dota 2 - Reborn
Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
Display FPS for Grand Theft Auto V
GTA V
Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for X-Plane 11
X-Plane 11
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-QQuadro M2000M
Low - 720p
93 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
79 FPS
--
High - 1080p
66 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
45 FPS
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q orQuadro M2000M

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q orQuadro M2000M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q358% better
23,57423% of 104,598
Quadro M2000M
5,1435% of 104,598

The Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q has 358% better performance than the Quadro M2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q is ranked 98th with a score of 23,574, and the Quadro M2000M is ranked 247th with a score of 5,143.

Performance per dollar
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
No data available
Quadro M2000M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and the Quadro M2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q orQuadro M2000M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkQuadro RTX 4000 Max-QQuadro M2000M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
6,764
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
6,724
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
35,167
(+18.03%)
29,795
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
17,049
(+310.13%)
4,157
3DMark 11 Performance Score
19,888
(+264.52%)
5,456
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
210.5
(+127.08%)
92.7
PassMark G3D Mark
12,487
(+261.1%)
3,458
PassMark G2D Mark
562
(+64.33%)
342
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
--
52.7
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
--
42.1
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecQuadro RTX 4000 Max-QQuadro M2000M
CodenameTU104GM107
ArchitectureTuringMaxwell
Process Size12 nm28 nm
Transistors13,600 million1,870 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecQuadro RTX 4000 Max-QQuadro M2000M
Memory Size8 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth384 Gb/s80.19 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,500 MHz1,253 MHz
Memory Interface256 bit128 bit
L1 Cache64 KB64 KB
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecQuadro RTX 4000 Max-QQuadro M2000M
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)80 W55 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecQuadro RTX 4000 Max-QQuadro M2000M
CUDA Cores2,560640
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)40--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)16040
Render Output Units (ROP)6416
Tensor Cores320--
Ray Tracing Cores40--
Core Clock Speed780 MHz1,098 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,380 MHz1,137 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecQuadro RTX 4000 Max-QQuadro M2000M
Pixel Fill Rate88.32 GPixel/s18.19 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate220.8 GTexel/s45.48 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance7.07 TFLOPS1,455 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance220.8 GFLOPS45.48 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecQuadro RTX 4000 Max-QQuadro M2000M
DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_0)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.7 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.