Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q182% better
23,57423% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 950
8,3518% of 104,598
The Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q has 182% better performance than the GeForce GTX 950 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
No data available
GeForce GTX 950
52.5233% of 161.45
The GeForce GTX 950 has 33% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Shop GeForce GTX 950
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q GPU
The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2019. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU104) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.
Memory
The RTX 4000 Max-Q has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 384 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RTX 4000 Max-Q includes 2,560 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 780 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,380 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 160 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 320 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 40 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 80 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The RTX 4000 Max-Q has the 98th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 22.54% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q3 2015 with a MSRP of $159. It is built on the Maxwell 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GM206) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 950 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,653 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 105.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 950 includes 768 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,024 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,188 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GTX 950 occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 250 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 90 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The GTX 950 has the 199th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.98% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 8,351 score and $159 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 52.52. This is the 63rd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q2 2019 | Q3 2015 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | -- | $159 |
| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
X-Plane 11
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Dota 2 - Reborn
The Witcher 3
GTA V
BioShock Infinite
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
X-Plane 11 | Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | 93 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | 79 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 66 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | 45 FPS | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q orGeForce GTX 950
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q | 62 | +37% |
| GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q | 60 | +32% |
| RTX A5000 Mobile | 55 | +21% |
| Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | 55 | +21% |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile | 53 | +17% |
| Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | 45.3 | |
| Radeon RX 7600M XT | 44 | -3% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | 44 | -3% |
| RTX A3000 Mobile | 40.5 | -11% |
| Arc A770M | 38.5 | -15% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q orGeForce GTX 950
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q182% better
23,57423% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 950
8,3518% of 104,598
The Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q has 182% better performance than the GeForce GTX 950 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q is ranked 98th with a score of 23,574, and the GeForce GTX 950 is ranked 199th with a score of 8,351.
Performance per dollar
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
No data available
GeForce GTX 950
52.5233% of 161.45
The GeForce GTX 950 has 80% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
GeForce GTX 950's 52.52 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | 24,620 | +4% |
| Radeon RX 5600M | 24,213 | +3% |
| Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | 23,574 | |
| GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q | 23,540 | -0% |
| GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | 22,575.5 | -4% |
| Radeon R7 370 | 8,518.5 | -64% |
| GeForce GTX 660 Ti | 8,415 | -64% |
| GeForce GTX 950 | 8,351 | -65% |
| GeForce GTX 760 | 7,962 | -66% |
| Radeon HD 7970 | 7,770 | -67% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q orGeForce GTX 950
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon R9 380 | 61.26 | +17% |
| GeForce GT 1030 | 59.84 | +14% |
| GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB) | 58.2 | +11% |
| Radeon R7 370 | 57.17 | +9% |
| GeForce GTX 960 | 54.11 | +3% |
| GeForce GTX 950 | 52.52 | |
| GeForce GTX 970 | 48.73 | -7% |
| Radeon R9 390X | 41.83 | -20% |
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti | 36.09 | -31% |
| Radeon R9 280X | 36.09 | -31% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 6,764 | -- |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 6,724 | -- |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 35,167 | 37,454 (+6.5%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 17,049 (+174.65%) | 6,207.5 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 19,888 (+133.43%) | 8,520 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 210.5 (+117.91%) | 96.6 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 12,487 (+134.01%) | 5,336 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 562 | 634 (+12.81%) |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | TU104 | GM206 |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Size | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 13,600 million | 2,940 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 384 Gb/s | 105.8 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,500 MHz | 1,653 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 256 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 1,024 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | -- | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 W | 90 W |
| Suggested PSU | -- | 250 W |
| Power Connectors | -- | 1x 6-pin |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.2 |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| CUDA Cores | 2,560 | 768 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 40 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 160 | 48 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 64 | 32 |
| Tensor Cores | 320 | -- |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | -- |
| Core Clock Speed | 780 MHz | 1,024 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,380 MHz | 1,188 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | 38.02 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 220.8 GTexel/s | 57.02 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 7.07 TFLOPS | 1.83 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 220.8 GFLOPS | 57.02 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.