PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

NVIDIA
VS
NVIDIA
Performance
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q875% better
17,52317% of 104,737
Quadro K2000M
1,7982% of 104,737

The Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q has 875% better performance than the Quadro K2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
No data available
Quadro K2000M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and the Quadro K2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Shop Quadro K2000M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2019. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU106) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.

Memory

The RTX 3000 Max-Q has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 192 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 288 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RTX 3000 Max-Q includes 1,920 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 600 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,215 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 120 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 240 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 30 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 60 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The RTX 3000 Max-Q has the 129th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 16.73% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA Quadro K2000M GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro K2000M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2012. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The K2000M has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 28.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The K2000M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 745 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 745 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 55 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The K2000M has the 376th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.72% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoQuadro RTX 3000 Max-QQuadro K2000M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureTuringKepler
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2019Q2 2012
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Hitman 3
Hitman 3
Display FPS for Cyberpunk 2077 (1.0)
Cyberpunk 2077 (1.0)
Display FPS for Immortals Fenyx Rising
Immortals Fenyx Rising
Display FPS for Yakuza: Like a Dragon
Yakuza: Like a Dragon
Display FPS for Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Display FPS for DIRT 5
DIRT 5
Display FPS for Watch Dogs: Legion
Watch Dogs: Legion

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Hitman 3
Hitman 3
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-QQuadro K2000M
Low - 720p
178 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
100 FPS
--
High - 1080p
86 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
78 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
27 FPS
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q orQuadro K2000M

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q orQuadro K2000M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q875% better
17,52317% of 104,737
Quadro K2000M
1,7982% of 104,737

The Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q has 875% better performance than the Quadro K2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q is ranked 129th with a score of 17,523, and the Quadro K2000M is ranked 376th with a score of 1,798.

Performance per dollar
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
No data available
Quadro K2000M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and the Quadro K2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q orQuadro K2000M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkQuadro RTX 3000 Max-QQuadro K2000M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
5,048
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
5,357
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
66,284
(+656.15%)
8,766
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
13,617
(+1,201.82%)
1,046
3DMark 11 Performance Score
16,577
(+730.93%)
1,995
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
202
--
PassMark G3D Mark
8,255
(+715.71%)
1,012
PassMark G2D Mark
341
(+33.73%)
255
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
--
17
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
--
17.1
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecQuadro RTX 3000 Max-QQuadro K2000M
CodenameTU106GK107
ArchitectureTuringKepler
Process Size12 nm28 nm
Transistors10,800 million1,270 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecQuadro RTX 3000 Max-QQuadro K2000M
Memory Size6 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6DDR3
Memory Bandwidth288 Gb/s28.8 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,500 MHz900 MHz
Memory Interface192 bit128 bit
L1 Cache64 KB16 KB
L2 Cache3 MB256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecQuadro RTX 3000 Max-QQuadro K2000M
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)60 W55 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecQuadro RTX 3000 Max-QQuadro K2000M
CUDA Cores1,920384
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)302
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)12032
Render Output Units (ROP)6416
Tensor Cores240--
Ray Tracing Cores30--
Core Clock Speed600 MHz745 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,215 MHz745 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecQuadro RTX 3000 Max-QQuadro K2000M
Pixel Fill Rate77.76 GPixel/s5.96 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate145.8 GTexel/s23.84 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance4.67 TFLOPS572.2 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance145.8 GFLOPS23.84 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecQuadro RTX 3000 Max-QQuadro K2000M
DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_0)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.