NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

VS
Performance
Quadro P3200 Mobile259% better
16,61916% of 104,598
GeForce MX250
4,6334% of 104,598

The Quadro P3200 Mobile has 259% better performance than the GeForce MX250 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Quadro P3200 Mobile
No data available
GeForce MX250
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro P3200 Mobile and the GeForce MX250 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Quadro P3200 Mobile
Shop GeForce MX250
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2018. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP104) and is manufactured on a 16 nm process.

Memory

The P3200 Mobile has 6 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,752 MHz memory clock and a 192 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 168.2 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The P3200 Mobile includes 1,792 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,328 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,543 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 112 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The P3200 Mobile has the 135th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 15.89% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce MX250 GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce MX250 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2019. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP108B) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The MX250 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,502 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 48.06 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The MX250 includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 937 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,038 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The MX250 has the 259th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 4.43% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoQuadro P3200 MobileGeForce MX250
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitecturePascalPascal
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2018Q1 2019
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Ready or Not
Ready or Not
Display FPS for The Finals
The Finals
Display FPS for Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora
Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora
Display FPS for EA Sports WRC
EA Sports WRC
Display FPS for Total War: PHARAOH
Total War: PHARAOH
Display FPS for Assassin's Creed Mirage
Assassin's Creed Mirage

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Quadro P3200 MobileGeForce MX250
Low - 1080p
--
20 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
11 FPS
High - 1080p
--
--
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro P3200 Mobile orGeForce MX250
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile22.2+107%
Radeon RX 560X Mobile21.5+101%
Radeon 660M16.7+56%
GeForce MX35013.8+29%
GeForce MX25010.7
Radeon RX 550 Mobile8.73-18%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro P3200 Mobile orGeForce MX250
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Quadro P3200 Mobile259% better
16,61916% of 104,598
GeForce MX250
4,6334% of 104,598

The Quadro P3200 Mobile has 259% better performance than the GeForce MX250 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Quadro P3200 Mobile is ranked 135th with a score of 16,619, and the GeForce MX250 is ranked 259th with a score of 4,633.

Performance per dollar
Quadro P3200 Mobile
No data available
GeForce MX250
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro P3200 Mobile and the GeForce MX250 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro P3200 Mobile or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro P3200 Mobile orGeForce MX250
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkQuadro P3200 MobileGeForce MX250
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
4,356
(+294.92%)
1,103
3DMark Time Spy Score
4,508.5
(+269.4%)
1,220.5
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
82,506.5
(+282.95%)
21,545
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
12,554.5
(+243.02%)
3,660
3DMark 11 Performance Score
15,085.5
(+211.04%)
4,850
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
172
(+72.69%)
99.6
PassMark G3D Mark
8,850
(+266.92%)
2,412
PassMark G2D Mark
460
(+92.47%)
239
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
--
43.6
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
--
43.7
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecQuadro P3200 MobileGeForce MX250
CodenameGP104GP108B
ArchitecturePascalPascal
Process Size16 nm14 nm
Transistors7,200 million1,800 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecQuadro P3200 MobileGeForce MX250
Memory Size6 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth168.2 Gb/s48.06 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,752 MHz1,502 MHz
Memory Interface192 bit64 bit
L1 Cache48 KB48 KB
L2 Cache1,536 KB512 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecQuadro P3200 MobileGeForce MX250
Bus InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x4
Thermal Design Power (TDP)75 W10 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecQuadro P3200 MobileGeForce MX250
CUDA Cores1,792384
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)143
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)11224
Render Output Units (ROP)6416
Core Clock Speed1,328 MHz937 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,543 MHz1,038 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecQuadro P3200 MobileGeForce MX250
Pixel Fill Rate98.75 GPixel/s16.61 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate172.8 GTexel/s24.91 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance5.53 TFLOPS797.2 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance172.8 GFLOPS24.91 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecQuadro P3200 MobileGeForce MX250
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.