NVIDIA Quadro P3000 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX230

VS
Performance
Quadro P3000260% better
12,10512% of 104,598
GeForce MX230
3,363.53% of 104,598

The Quadro P3000 has 260% better performance than the GeForce MX230 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Quadro P3000
No data available
GeForce MX230
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro P3000 and the GeForce MX230 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Quadro P3000
Shop GeForce MX230
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA Quadro P3000 GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro P3000 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2017. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP104) and is manufactured on a 16 nm process.

Memory

The P3000 has 6 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,752 MHz memory clock and a 192 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 168.2 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The P3000 includes 1,280 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,088 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,215 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 80 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 48 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The P3000 has the 161st best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 11.57% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce MX230 GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce MX230 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2019. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP108) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The MX230 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,502 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 48.06 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The MX230 includes 256 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,519 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,531 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The MX230 has the 287th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.22% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoQuadro P3000GeForce MX230
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitecturePascalPascal
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2017Q1 2019
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3
Display FPS for GRID (2019)
GRID (2019)
Display FPS for Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Breakpoint
Ghost Recon Breakpoint
Display FPS for FIFA 20
FIFA 20
Display FPS for Control
Control
Display FPS for F1 2019
F1 2019
Display FPS for Total War: Three Kingdoms
Total War: Three Kingdoms

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3
Quadro P3000GeForce MX230
Low - 720p
--
40 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
16 FPS
High - 1080p
--
10 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
7 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro P3000 orGeForce MX230
GPUFrames Per Second
Iris Xe MAX11.7+58%
GeForce GTX 950M10.3+39%
GeForce MX25010.2+38%
GeForce MX3308.8+19%
GeForce MX1508.4+14%
GeForce MX2307.4
Radeon 610M6-19%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro P3000 orGeForce MX230
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Quadro P3000260% better
12,10512% of 104,598
GeForce MX230
3,363.53% of 104,598

The Quadro P3000 has 260% better performance than the GeForce MX230 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Quadro P3000 is ranked 161st with a score of 12,105, and the GeForce MX230 is ranked 287th with a score of 3,363.5.

Performance per dollar
Quadro P3000
No data available
GeForce MX230
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro P3000 and the GeForce MX230 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro P3000 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile12,340+2%
Radeon Pro Vega 2012,289+2%
Quadro P300012,105
Arc A370M12,089.5-0%
Quadro M5000M11,845-2%
Quadro K4000M3,466-71%
GeForce GTX 760M3,369-72%
GeForce MX2303,363.5-72%
Radeon R9 M3753,314-73%
GeForce 945M3,309.5-73%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro P3000 orGeForce MX230
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkQuadro P3000GeForce MX230
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
2,864
(+282.89%)
748
3DMark Time Spy Score
2,999
(+257.24%)
839.5
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
63,331.5
(+300.92%)
15,796.5
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
9,255.5
(+275.1%)
2,467.5
3DMark 11 Performance Score
11,229
(+210.06%)
3,621.5
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
113.4
(+35.97%)
83.4
PassMark G3D Mark
6,520
(+255.31%)
1,835
PassMark G2D Mark
426
(+100%)
213
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecQuadro P3000GeForce MX230
CodenameGP104GP108
ArchitecturePascalPascal
Process Size16 nm14 nm
Transistors7,200 million1,800 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecQuadro P3000GeForce MX230
Memory Size6 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth168.2 Gb/s48.06 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,752 MHz1,502 MHz
Memory Interface192 bit64 bit
L1 Cache48 KB48 KB
L2 Cache1,536 KB512 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecQuadro P3000GeForce MX230
Bus InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x4
Thermal Design Power (TDP)75 W10 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecQuadro P3000GeForce MX230
CUDA Cores1,280256
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)102
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)8016
Render Output Units (ROP)4816
Core Clock Speed1,088 MHz1,519 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,215 MHz1,531 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecQuadro P3000GeForce MX230
Pixel Fill Rate58.32 GPixel/s24.5 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate97.2 GTexel/s24.5 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance3.11 TFLOPS783.9 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance97.2 GFLOPS24.5 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecQuadro P3000GeForce MX230
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.