NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6800
The Radeon PRO W6800 has 429% better performance than the Quadro P2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon PRO W6800 has 12% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Summary
About the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 GPU
The Quadro P2000 is an end-of-life workstation graphics card by NVIDIA. It launched in Q1 2017. Its GP106 chip that powers the GPU uses the Pascal architecture and is fabricated on the 16 nm process.
This GPU is paired with 5 GB of GDDR5 VRAM. Its 1,752 MHz memory clock and 160 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 140.2 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
The P2000 is a compact, low-profile graphics card, taking up 1 PCIe slot. It supports DisplayPort 1.4a display ports. This workstation card has a TDP of 75 W. NVIDIA recommends using a power supply of at least 250 W with this card. A power supply lower than this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
The Quadro P2000 has the 195th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.99% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 GPU
The Radeon PRO W6800 is a workstation graphics card by AMD. It launched in Q2 2021 with a suggested retail price of $2,249. Its Navi 21 chip that powers the GPU uses the RDNA 2.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 7 nm process.
This GPU is paired with 32 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. Its 2,000 MHz memory clock and 256 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 512 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
The PRO W6800 is a dual slot graphics card, taking up 2 PCIe slots. It supports mini-DisplayPort 1.4a display ports. This workstation card has a TDP of 250 W. AMD recommends using a power supply of at least 600 W with this card. A power supply lower than this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
The Radeon PRO W6800 has the 30th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 42.31% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 44,404 score and $2,249 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 19.74. This is the 84th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Quadro P2000 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Market Segment | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release Date | Q1 2017 | Q2 2021 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | -- | $2,249 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
F1 2020 | Quadro P2000 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | -- | 300 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 283 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 225 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | 179 FPS |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | 109 FPS |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| RTX A6000 | 137 | +26% |
| Radeon PRO W6800 | 109 | |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon PRO W6800 | 20.63 | |
| RTX A6000 | 33.93 | +64% |
Benchmark Performance
The Radeon PRO W6800 has 429% better performance than the Quadro P2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Quadro P2000 is ranked 195th with a score of 8,387, and the Radeon PRO W6800 is ranked 30th with a score of 44,404.
The Radeon PRO W6800 has 30% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
Radeon PRO W6800's 19.74 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| RTX 6000 Ada Generation | 70,850 | +745% |
| RTX A6000 | 50,957 | +508% |
| Radeon PRO W6800 | 44,404 | +429% |
| Radeon Pro Vega 56 | 25,589 | +205% |
| Quadro P5000 | 20,096 | +140% |
| Quadro P4000 | 15,433 | +84% |
| T600 | 8,694 | +4% |
| Quadro P2000 | 8,387 | |
| Quadro P1000 | 6,001 | -28% |
| Quadro P620 | 5,909 | -30% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon Pro WX 3200 | 21.8 | +10% |
| Radeon PRO W6800 | 19.74 | |
| Quadro P4000 | 18.94 | -4% |
| Radeon Pro WX 3100 | 18.55 | -6% |
| RTX A6000 | 10.96 | -44% |
| RTX 6000 Ada Generation | 10.42 | -47% |
| Quadro P5000 | 8.04 | -59% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Quadro P2000 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 2,046 | 12,136 (+493.16%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2,259 | 11,941 (+428.6%) |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 43,565.5 | 92,363 (+112.01%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 6,847 | 27,937 (+308.02%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | -- | 131,421 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 8,699 | 30,190 (+247.05%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 180.9 (+1.8%) | 177.7 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 6,927 | 19,787 (+185.65%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 635 | 939 (+47.87%) |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Quadro P2000 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GP106 | Navi 21 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Size | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Transistors | 4,400 million | 26,800 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Quadro P2000 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 5 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 140.2 Gb/s | 512 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,752 MHz | 2,000 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 160 bit | 256 bit |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1,280 KB | 4 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Quadro P2000 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 1 slot | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 W | 250 W |
| Suggested PSU | 250 W | 600 W |
| Power Connectors | -- | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Outputs | DisplayPort 1.4a | mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Quadro P2000 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 3,840 |
| CUDA Cores | 1,024 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 60 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 8 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 64 | 240 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 40 | 96 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | -- | 60 |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,076 MHz | 2,075 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,480 MHz | 2,320 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Quadro P2000 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 59.2 GPixel/s | 222.7 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 94.72 GTexel/s | 556.8 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 3.03 TFLOPS | 17.82 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 94.72 GFLOPS | 1,114 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Quadro P2000 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.