NVIDIA Quadro M520 vs AMD Radeon R9 M385X

VS
Performance
Quadro M520
2,6583% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M385X107% better
5,514.55% of 104,598

The Radeon R9 M385X has 107% better performance than the Quadro M520 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Quadro M520
No data available
Radeon R9 M385X
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro M520 and the Radeon R9 M385X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Quadro M520
Shop Radeon R9 M385X
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA Quadro M520 GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro M520 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2017. It is built on the Maxwell GPU microarchitecture (codename GM108) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The M520 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,253 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 40.1 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The M520 includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 965 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,176 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 25 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The M520 has the 320th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.54% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon R9 M385X GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 M385X is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Strato) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 M385X has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,200 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 76.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 M385X includes 896 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,100 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 56 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The R9 M385X has the 234th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.27% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoQuadro M520Radeon R9 M385X
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureMaxwellGCN 2.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2017Q2 2015
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Quadro M520Radeon R9 M385X
Low - 768p
--
39 FPS
Medium - 768p
--
35 FPS
High - 1080p
--
20 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
15 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro M520 orRadeon R9 M385X
GPUFrames Per Second
Radeon Pro 45518.3+20%
GeForce MX15018+18%
GeForce GTX 950M17+12%
GeForce GTX 850M17+12%
Radeon R9 M280X16.6+9%
Radeon R9 M385X15.2
GeForce MX13013-14%
Radeon RX 540 Mobile13-14%
Quadro M600M12.7-16%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro M520 orRadeon R9 M385X
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Quadro M520
2,6583% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M385X107% better
5,514.55% of 104,598

The Radeon R9 M385X has 107% better performance than the Quadro M520 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Quadro M520 is ranked 320th with a score of 2,658, and the Radeon R9 M385X is ranked 234th with a score of 5,514.5.

Performance per dollar
Quadro M520
No data available
Radeon R9 M385X
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro M520 and the Radeon R9 M385X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro M520 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon HD 7970M5,645+112%
Radeon HD 6970M X25,541.5+108%
Radeon R9 M385X5,514.5+107%
Radeon Pro 4555,388+103%
FirePro M61005,369+102%
GeForce GTX 670M2,698+2%
Quadro 5010M2,693+1%
Quadro M5202,658
Radeon R9 M265X2,633-1%
GeForce 940MX2,556-4%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro M520 orRadeon R9 M385X
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkQuadro M520Radeon R9 M385X
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
614
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
684
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
13,394
22,544
(+68.31%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
2,342
3,404.5
(+45.37%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
2,884
4,456.5
(+54.52%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
75.5
(+68.53%)
44.8
PassMark G3D Mark
1,870
1,994
(+6.63%)
PassMark G2D Mark
227
267
(+17.62%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
27.9
--
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
28.8
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecQuadro M520Radeon R9 M385X
CodenameGM108Strato
ArchitectureMaxwellGCN 2.0
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors1,020 million2,080 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecQuadro M520Radeon R9 M385X
Memory Size2 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth40.1 Gb/s76.8 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,253 MHz1,200 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit128 bit
L1 Cache64 KB16 KB
L2 Cache1,024 KB256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecQuadro M520Radeon R9 M385X
Bus InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)25 W75 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecQuadro M520Radeon R9 M385X
Stream Processors (SP)--896
CUDA Cores384--
Compute Units (CU)--14
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)1656
Render Output Units (ROP)816
Core Clock Speed965 MHz1,000 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,176 MHz1,100 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecQuadro M520Radeon R9 M385X
Pixel Fill Rate9.41 GPixel/s17.6 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate18.82 GTexel/s61.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance903.2 GFLOPS1.97 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance28.22 GFLOPS123.2 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecQuadro M520Radeon R9 M385X
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
OpenCL3.02.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.7 (5.1)6.5

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.