NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

VS
Performance
Quadro M3000M106% better
8,288.58% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 765M
4,0194% of 104,598

The Quadro M3000M has 106% better performance than the GeForce GTX 765M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Quadro M3000M
No data available
GeForce GTX 765M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro M3000M and the GeForce GTX 765M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Quadro M3000M
Shop GeForce GTX 765M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA Quadro M3000M GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro M3000M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q3 2015. It is built on the Maxwell 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GM204) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The M3000M has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,253 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 160.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The M3000M includes 1,024 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 823 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 924 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The M3000M has the 201st best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.92% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK106) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 765M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,002 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64.13 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 765M includes 768 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 797 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 863 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 765M has the 274th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.84% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoQuadro M3000MGeForce GTX 765M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0Kepler
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ3 2015Q2 2013
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
Display FPS for Grand Theft Auto V
GTA V
Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Display FPS for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
CS: GO

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Quadro M3000MGeForce GTX 765M
Low - 768p
115 FPS
--
Medium - 768p
70 FPS
--
High - 1080p
40 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
33 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro M3000M orGeForce GTX 765M

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro M3000M orGeForce GTX 765M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Quadro M3000M106% better
8,288.58% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 765M
4,0194% of 104,598

The Quadro M3000M has 106% better performance than the GeForce GTX 765M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Quadro M3000M is ranked 201st with a score of 8,288.5, and the GeForce GTX 765M is ranked 274th with a score of 4,019.

Performance per dollar
Quadro M3000M
No data available
GeForce GTX 765M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro M3000M and the GeForce GTX 765M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro M3000M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce GTX 880M8,578+3%
Radeon RX 560 Mobile8,329+0%
Quadro M3000M8,288.5
GeForce MX4508,250-0%
Iris Xe MAX8,214-1%
Quadro P5204,185.5-50%
Radeon 540X4,097-51%
GeForce GTX 765M4,019-52%
GeForce GTX 675MX3,978.5-52%
Quadro M6203,801-54%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro M3000M orGeForce GTX 765M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkQuadro M3000MGeForce GTX 765M
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
44,602.5
(+153.19%)
17,616
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
6,536.5
(+163.67%)
2,479
3DMark 11 Performance Score
8,539.5
(+109.15%)
4,083
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
92.1
(+4.3%)
88.3
PassMark G3D Mark
5,594
(+180.26%)
1,996
PassMark G2D Mark
408
(+43.16%)
285
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
80
(+123.46%)
35.8
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
59.8
(+119.05%)
27.3
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecQuadro M3000MGeForce GTX 765M
CodenameGM204GK106
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0Kepler
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors5,200 million2,540 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecQuadro M3000MGeForce GTX 765M
Memory Size4 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth160.4 Gb/s64.13 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,253 MHz1,002 MHz
Memory Interface256 bit128 bit
L1 Cache48 KB16 KB
L2 Cache2 MB256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecQuadro M3000MGeForce GTX 765M
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)75 W75 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecQuadro M3000MGeForce GTX 765M
CUDA Cores1,024768
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--4
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)6464
Render Output Units (ROP)3216
Core Clock Speed823 MHz797 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)924 MHz863 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecQuadro M3000MGeForce GTX 765M
Pixel Fill Rate29.57 GPixel/s13.81 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate59.14 GTexel/s55.23 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1.89 TFLOPS1,326 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance59.14 GFLOPS55.23 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecQuadro M3000MGeForce GTX 765M
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.