NVIDIA Quadro M2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
The Quadro M3000M has 12% better performance than the Quadro M2200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro M2200 and the Quadro M3000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the NVIDIA Quadro M2200 GPU
The Quadro M2200 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card by NVIDIA. It launched in Q1 2017. Its GM206 chip that powers the GPU uses the Maxwell 2.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 28 nm process.
Memory
This GPU is paired with 4 GB of GDDR5 VRAM. Its 1,377 MHz memory clock and 128 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 88.13 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
Compatibility
This mobile card has a TDP of 55 W.
Benchmark Performance
The Quadro M2200 has the 211th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.03% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA Quadro M3000M GPU
The Quadro M3000M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card by NVIDIA. It launched in Q3 2015. Its GM204 chip that powers the GPU uses the Maxwell 2.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 28 nm process.
Memory
This GPU is paired with 4 GB of GDDR5 VRAM. Its 1,253 MHz memory clock and 256 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 160.4 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
Compatibility
This mobile card has a TDP of 75 W.
Benchmark Performance
The Quadro M3000M has the 198th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.90% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Quadro M2200 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q1 2017 | Q3 2015 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Rise of the Tomb Raider | Quadro M2200 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 768p | -- | 115 FPS |
| Medium - 768p | -- | 70 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 40 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 33 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Quadro M4000M | 48 | +44% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 41.7 | +25% |
| GeForce GTX 970M | 38 | +14% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | 38 | +14% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | 36 | +8% |
| Quadro M3000M | 33.4 | |
| GeForce GTX 880M | 32.3 | -3% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | 32 | -4% |
| Quadro P2000 Mobile | 32 | -4% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | 29 | -13% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Quadro M3000M has 12% better performance than the Quadro M2200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Quadro M2200 is ranked 211th with a score of 7,372, and the Quadro M3000M is ranked 198th with a score of 8,288.5.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro M2200 and the Quadro M3000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 880M | 8,578 | +16% |
| Radeon RX 560 (Mobile) | 8,329 | +13% |
| Quadro M3000M | 8,288.5 | +12% |
| GeForce MX450 | 8,250 | +12% |
| Iris Xe MAX | 8,214 | +11% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | 7,678.5 | +4% |
| Radeon Pro 560X | 7,590 | +3% |
| Quadro M2200 | 7,372 | |
| GeForce GTX 965M | 7,322 | -1% |
| GeForce GTX 870M | 7,156 | -3% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Quadro M2200 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 1,724 | -- |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1,903 | -- |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 37,796 | 44,602.5 (+18.01%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 5,850 | 6,536.5 (+11.74%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 7,581 | 8,539.5 (+12.64%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 103.9 (+12.81%) | 92.1 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 4,294 | 5,530 (+28.78%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 383 | 400 (+4.44%) |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | -- | 80 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL | -- | 59.8 |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Quadro M2200 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GM206 | GM204 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 2,940 million | 5,200 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Quadro M2200 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 88.13 Gb/s | 160.4 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,377 MHz | 1,253 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1,024 KB | 2 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Quadro M2200 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 W | 75 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Quadro M2200 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| CUDA Cores | 1,024 | 1,024 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 64 | 64 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 32 | 32 |
| Core Clock Speed | 695 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,036 MHz | 924 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Quadro M2200 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 33.15 GPixel/s | 29.57 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 66.3 GTexel/s | 59.14 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 2.12 TFLOPS | 1.89 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 66.3 GFLOPS | 59.14 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Quadro M2200 | Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 (6.4) |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.