NVIDIA Quadro M2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

VS
Performance
Quadro M2200
7,3727% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile80% better
13,26613% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has 80% better performance than the Quadro M2200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Quadro M2200
No data available
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro M2200 and the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Quadro M2200
Shop GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA Quadro M2200 GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro M2200 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2017. It is built on the Maxwell 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GM206) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The M2200 has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,377 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 88.13 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The M2200 includes 1,024 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 695 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,036 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 55 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The M2200 has the 214th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.05% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2020. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU116) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 192 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 1650 Ti Mobile includes 1,024 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,350 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,485 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has the 154th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 12.68% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoQuadro M2200GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0Turing
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2017Q2 2020
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Black Myth: Wukong
Black Myth: Wukong
Display FPS for The First Descendant
The First Descendant
Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Display FPS for Ghost of Tsushima
Ghost of Tsushima
Display FPS for Horizon Forbidden West
Horizon Forbidden West
Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Black Myth: Wukong
Black Myth: Wukong
Quadro M2200GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Low - 1080p
--
30 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
21 FPS
High - 1080p
--
15 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro M2200 orGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GPUFrames Per Second
Our database does not have enough FPS data to compare with other GPUs.

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro M2200 orGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Quadro M2200
7,3727% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile80% better
13,26613% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has 80% better performance than the Quadro M2200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Quadro M2200 is ranked 214th with a score of 7,372, and the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is ranked 154th with a score of 13,266.

Performance per dollar
Quadro M2200
No data available
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro M2200 and the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro M2200 or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro M2200 orGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkQuadro M2200GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1,724
3,618
(+109.86%)
3DMark Time Spy Score
1,903
3,851
(+102.36%)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
37,796
65,163
(+72.41%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
5,850
9,930
(+69.74%)
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
--
44,557
3DMark 11 Performance Score
7,581
13,072.5
(+72.44%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
103.9
126.7
(+21.94%)
PassMark G3D Mark
4,294
7,539
(+75.57%)
PassMark G2D Mark
383
389
(+1.57%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecQuadro M2200GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
CodenameGM206TU116
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0Turing
Process Size28 nm12 nm
Transistors2,940 million6,600 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecQuadro M2200GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Memory Size4 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth88.13 Gb/s192 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,377 MHz1,500 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit128 bit
L1 Cache48 KB64 KB
L2 Cache1,024 KB1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecQuadro M2200GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Bus InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)55 W50 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecQuadro M2200GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
CUDA Cores1,0241,024
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--16
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)6464
Render Output Units (ROP)3232
Core Clock Speed695 MHz1,350 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,036 MHz1,485 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecQuadro M2200GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Pixel Fill Rate33.15 GPixel/s47.52 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate66.3 GTexel/s95.04 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance2.12 TFLOPS3.04 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance66.3 GFLOPS95.04 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecQuadro M2200GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.76.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.