NVIDIA Quadro M2200 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
The Quadro M2200 has 762% better performance than the Mobility Radeon HD 5650 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro M2200 and the Mobility Radeon HD 5650 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the NVIDIA Quadro M2200 GPU
The NVIDIA Quadro M2200 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2017. It is built on the Maxwell 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GM206) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The M2200 has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,377 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 88.13 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The M2200 includes 1,024 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 695 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,036 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 55 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The M2200 has the 214th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.04% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 GPU
The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2010. It is built on the TeraScale 2 GPU microarchitecture (codename Madison) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.
Memory
The Mobility HD 5650 has 1,024 MB of GDDR3 memory, with a 800 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 25.6 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Mobility HD 5650 includes 400 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 450 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 650 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 20 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The Mobility HD 5650 has the 474th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.82% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Quadro M2200 | Mobility Radeon HD 5650 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | ATI |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q1 2017 | Q1 2010 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
CS: GO | Quadro M2200 | Mobility Radeon HD 5650 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 768p | -- | 102 FPS |
| Medium - 768p | -- | 87 FPS |
| High - 768p | -- | 70 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 39 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GT 730M | 52 | +33% |
| Radeon HD 8730M | 48.8 | +25% |
| Radeon HD 7670M | 46 | +18% |
| GeForce 840M | 45.5 | +16% |
| Radeon R7 M360 | 43.8 | +12% |
| Mobility Radeon HD 5650 | 39.1 | |
| GeForce GT 630M | 38 | -3% |
| Radeon HD 7610M | 38 | -3% |
| GeForce GT 735M | 32 | -18% |
| GeForce 910M | 29.7 | -24% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Quadro M2200 has 762% better performance than the Mobility Radeon HD 5650 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Quadro M2200 is ranked 214th with a score of 7,372, and the Mobility Radeon HD 5650 is ranked 474th with a score of 855.5.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro M2200 and the Mobility Radeon HD 5650 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | 7,678.5 | +4% |
| Radeon Pro 560X | 7,590 | +3% |
| Quadro M2200 | 7,372 | |
| GeForce GTX 965M | 7,322 | -1% |
| GeForce GTX 870M | 7,156 | -3% |
| GeForce GT 540M | 888 | -88% |
| Radeon HD 6630M | 877 | -88% |
| Mobility Radeon HD 5650 | 855.5 | -88% |
| FirePro M2000 | 841 | -89% |
| Radeon HD 7570M | 829 | -89% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Quadro M2200 | Mobility Radeon HD 5650 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 1,724 | -- |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1,903 | -- |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 37,796 (+526.18%) | 6,036 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 5,850 (+701.37%) | 730 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 7,581 (+693.82%) | 955 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 103.9 | -- |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 4,294 (+854.22%) | 450 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 383 (+162.33%) | 146 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | -- | 9.9 |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Quadro M2200 | Mobility Radeon HD 5650 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GM206 | Madison |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Transistors | 2,940 million | 627 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Quadro M2200 | Mobility Radeon HD 5650 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 4 GB | 1,024 MB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 88.13 Gb/s | 25.6 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,377 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 8 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1,024 KB | 256 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Quadro M2200 | Mobility Radeon HD 5650 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 W | 15 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Quadro M2200 | Mobility Radeon HD 5650 |
|---|---|---|
| Shading Units | -- | 400 |
| CUDA Cores | 1,024 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 5 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 64 | 20 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 32 | 8 |
| Core Clock Speed | 695 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,036 MHz | 650 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Quadro M2200 | Mobility Radeon HD 5650 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 33.15 GPixel/s | 3.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 66.3 GTexel/s | 9 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 2.12 TFLOPS | 360 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 66.3 GFLOPS | -- |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Quadro M2200 | Mobility Radeon HD 5650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 5.0 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.