PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs Intel Arc Graphics 140T

NVIDIA
VS
Intel
Performance
Quadro M2000M
5,1434% of 129,772
Arc Graphics 140T144% better
12,56610% of 129,772

The Arc Graphics 140T has 144% better performance than the Quadro M2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Quadro M2000M
No data available
Arc Graphics 140T
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro M2000M and the Arc Graphics 140T for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Quadro M2000M
Shop Arc Graphics 140T
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro M2000M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q4 2015. It is built on the Maxwell GPU microarchitecture (codename GM107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The M2000M has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,253 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 80.19 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The M2000M includes 640 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,098 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,137 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 55 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The M2000M has the 271st best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 567 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.96% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090.

About the Intel Arc Graphics 140T GPU

The Intel Arc Graphics 140T is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q1 2025. It is built on the Xe2-LPG GPU microarchitecture (codename Arrow Lake) and is manufactured on a 3 nm process.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Arc Graphics 140T includes 1,024 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,350 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 128 Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX) optimized for AI workloads and 8 ray tracing units dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 35 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Arc Graphics 140T has the 175th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 567 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.68% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoQuadro M2000MArc Graphics 140T
ManufacturerNVIDIAIntel
ArchitectureMaxwellXe2-LPG
Market SegmentMobileIntegrated
Release DateQ4 2015Q1 2025
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Total War: PHARAOH
Total War: PHARAOH
Display FPS for Baldur's Gate 3
Baldur's Gate 3
Display FPS for Strange Brigade
Strange Brigade
Display FPS for X-Plane 11
X-Plane 11
Display FPS for Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
Display FPS for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 24
F1 24
Quadro M2000MArc Graphics 140T
Low - 1080p
--
80 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
72 FPS
High - 1080p
--
57 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
19 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro M2000M orArc Graphics 140T
GPUFrames Per Second
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)20.4+7%
Arc Graphics 140T19
Radeon 780M12-37%
Radeon 860M11-42%
Radeon 740M2-89%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro M2000M orArc Graphics 140T
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Quadro M2000M
5,1434% of 129,772
Arc Graphics 140T144% better
12,56610% of 129,772

The Arc Graphics 140T has 144% better performance than the Quadro M2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Quadro M2000M is ranked 271st with a score of 5,143, and the Arc Graphics 140T is ranked 175th with a score of 12,566.

Performance per dollar
Quadro M2000M
No data available
Arc Graphics 140T
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro M2000M and the Arc Graphics 140T for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro M2000M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon RX Vega M GH14,302+178%
Radeon 780M12,818.5+149%
Arc Graphics 140T12,566+144%
Radeon 860M11,680+127%
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL10,020+95%
GeForce GTX 960M5,278+3%
Radeon Pro 5555,185+1%
Quadro M2000M5,143
Quadro K4100M4,957-4%
GeForce GTX 860M4,902-5%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro M2000M orArc Graphics 140T
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkQuadro M2000MArc Graphics 140T
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
4,074
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
4,421
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
29,795
51,620
(+73.25%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
4,157
9,328
(+124.39%)
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
--
40,046
3DMark 11 Performance Score
5,456
13,428
(+146.11%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
92.7
205
(+121.14%)
PassMark G3D Mark
3,435
--
PassMark G2D Mark
332
--
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
52.7
--
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
42.1
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecQuadro M2000MArc Graphics 140T
CodenameGM107Arrow Lake
ArchitectureMaxwellXe2-LPG
Process Size28 nm3 nm
Transistors1,870 million17,800 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecQuadro M2000MArc Graphics 140T
Memory Size4 GBSystem Shared
Memory TypeGDDR5System Shared
Memory Bandwidth80.19 Gb/sSystem Dependent
Memory Clock1,253 MHzSystem Shared
Memory Interface128 bitSystem Shared
L1 Cache64 KB--
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecQuadro M2000MArc Graphics 140T
Bus InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)55 W35 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecQuadro M2000MArc Graphics 140T
Shading Units--1,024
CUDA Cores640--
Execution Units (EU)--8
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)4064
Render Output Units (ROP)1632
Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX)--128
Ray Tracing Units (RTU)--8
Core Clock Speed1,098 MHz300 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,137 MHz2,350 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecQuadro M2000MArc Graphics 140T
Pixel Fill Rate18.19 GPixel/s75.2 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate45.48 GTexel/s150.4 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1,455.4 GFLOPS4.81 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance45.48 GFLOPS1,203.2 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecQuadro M2000MArc Graphics 140T
DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.7 (5.1)6.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.