NVIDIA Quadro K4100M vs AMD Radeon R5 M330
The Quadro K4100M has 193% better performance than the Radeon R5 M330 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Quadro K4100M has 2% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Summary
About the NVIDIA Quadro K4100M GPU
The NVIDIA Quadro K4100M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q3 2013 with a MSRP of $1,499. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK104) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The K4100M has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 800 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 102.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The K4100M includes 1,152 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 706 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 706 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 96 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 100 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The K4100M has the 249th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 4.73% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 4,957 score and $1,499 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 3.31. This is the 103rd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
About the AMD Radeon R5 M330 GPU
The AMD Radeon R5 M330 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Exo) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The R5 M330 has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R5 M330 includes 320 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 955 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,030 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 20 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 18 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The R5 M330 has the 396th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.61% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Quadro K4100M | Radeon R5 M330 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q3 2013 | Q2 2015 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $1,499 | -- |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Rise of the Tomb Raider | Quadro K4100M | Radeon R5 M330 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 768p | -- | 19 FPS |
| Medium - 768p | -- | 12 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 6 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 4 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile | 83 | +2,028% |
| GeForce GTX 980M | 49 | +1,156% |
| Quadro P2000 Mobile | 32 | +721% |
| GeForce GT 740M | 6.4 | +64% |
| Radeon R7 M360 | 4.1 | +5% |
| Radeon R5 M330 | 3.9 | |
| GeForce 920M | 3.7 | -5% |
| GeForce 910M | 3.5 | -10% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Quadro K4100M has 193% better performance than the Radeon R5 M330 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Quadro K4100M is ranked 249th with a score of 4,957, and the Radeon R5 M330 is ranked 396th with a score of 1,689.
The Quadro K4100M has 5% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
Quadro K4100M's 3.31 performance per dollar ranks it 103rd among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Quadro K4100M | 4,957 | |
| GeForce GT 735M | 1,713 | -65% |
| Radeon HD 8750M | 1,698 | -66% |
| Radeon R5 M330 | 1,689 | -66% |
| Radeon R5 M430 | 1,689 | -66% |
| Radeon R5 M320 | 1,652 | -67% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Quadro K4100M | Radeon R5 M330 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 24,685 (+404.08%) | 4,897 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 3,654 (+296.31%) | 922 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 5,259.5 (+195.15%) | 1,782 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 115 (+310.71%) | 28 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 2,754 (+362.08%) | 596 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 325 | 517 (+59.08%) |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 48.1 | -- |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL | 47.6 | -- |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Quadro K4100M | Radeon R5 M330 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GK104 | Exo |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 3,540 million | 690 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Quadro K4100M | Radeon R5 M330 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 102.4 Gb/s | 14.4 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 800 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 256 bit | 64 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 16 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 128 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Quadro K4100M | Radeon R5 M330 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 W | 18 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Quadro K4100M | Radeon R5 M330 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 320 |
| CUDA Cores | 1,152 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 5 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 6 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 96 | 20 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 32 | 8 |
| Core Clock Speed | 706 MHz | 955 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 706 MHz | 1,030 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Quadro K4100M | Radeon R5 M330 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 16.94 GPixel/s | 8.24 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 67.78 GTexel/s | 20.6 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 1.63 TFLOPS | 659.2 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 67.78 GFLOPS | 41.2 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Quadro K4100M | Radeon R5 M330 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 (1.2) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 6.5 (5.1) |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.