NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
The Quadro T2000 Max-Q has 231% better performance than the Quadro K4000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro K4000M and the Quadro T2000 Max-Q for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M GPU
The NVIDIA Quadro K4000M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2012. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK104) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The K4000M has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 700 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 89.6 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The K4000M includes 960 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 601 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 601 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 80 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 100 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The K4000M has the 283rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.31% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q GPU
The NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2019. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU117) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.
Memory
The T2000 Max-Q has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,250 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 80 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The T2000 Max-Q includes 1,024 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,035 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,395 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 40 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The T2000 Max-Q has the 166th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 10.94% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Quadro K4000M | Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q2 2012 | Q2 2019 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
F1 2020 | Quadro K4000M | Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | -- | 182 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 96 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 78 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 55 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 5500M | 69 | +25% |
| GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | 66 | +20% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | 64 | +16% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 57 | +4% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | 57 | +4% |
| Quadro T2000 Max-Q | 55 | |
| Radeon 680M | 40 | -27% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | 39 | -29% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Quadro T2000 Max-Q has 231% better performance than the Quadro K4000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Quadro K4000M is ranked 283rd with a score of 3,466, and the Quadro T2000 Max-Q is ranked 166th with a score of 11,461.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro K4000M and the Quadro T2000 Max-Q for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Quadro M5000M | 11,845 | +242% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | 11,538 | +233% |
| Quadro T2000 Max-Q | 11,461 | +231% |
| Quadro T1000 Mobile | 11,377 | +228% |
| Radeon HD 7970M X2 | 11,119 | +221% |
| GeForce GTX 670MX | 3,587 | +3% |
| Quadro K3100M | 3,581 | +3% |
| Quadro K4000M | 3,466 | |
| GeForce GTX 760M | 3,369 | -3% |
| GeForce MX230 | 3,363.5 | -3% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Quadro K4000M | Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 3,094 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 3,352 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 19,058 | 41,106 (+115.69%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 2,199 | 8,261.5 (+275.69%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 3,777 | 11,907 (+215.25%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | -- | 220 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 1,961 | 6,900 (+251.86%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 302 | 425 (+40.73%) |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 36.5 | -- |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Quadro K4000M | Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GK104 | TU117 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Transistors | 3,540 million | 4,700 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Quadro K4000M | Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 Gb/s | 80 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 700 MHz | 1,250 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 256 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 1,024 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Quadro K4000M | Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 W | 40 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Quadro K4000M | Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| CUDA Cores | 960 | 1,024 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 5 | 16 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 80 | 64 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 32 | 32 |
| Core Clock Speed | 601 MHz | 1,035 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 601 MHz | 1,395 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Quadro K4000M | Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 12.02 GPixel/s | 44.64 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 48.08 GTexel/s | 89.28 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 1,154 GFLOPS | 2.86 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 48.08 GFLOPS | 89.28 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Quadro K4000M | Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.