NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

VS
Performance
Quadro K3000M
2,4272% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q357% better
11,082.511% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q has 357% better performance than the Quadro K3000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Quadro K3000M
No data available
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro K3000M and the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Quadro K3000M
Shop GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro K3000M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2012. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK104) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The K3000M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 700 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 89.6 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The K3000M includes 576 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 654 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 654 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The K3000M has the 330th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.32% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2019. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU117) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 1650 Max-Q has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,751 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 112.1 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 1650 Max-Q includes 1,024 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,020 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,245 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 1650 Max-Q has the 169th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 10.60% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoQuadro K3000MGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureKeplerTuring
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2012Q2 2019
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3
Display FPS for Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Display FPS for Need for Speed Heat
NFS Heat
Display FPS for Red Dead Redemption 2
Red Dead Redemption 2
Display FPS for Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)
Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)
Display FPS for GRID (2019)
GRID (2019)
Display FPS for Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Breakpoint
Ghost Recon Breakpoint

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3
Quadro K3000MGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Low - 720p
--
95 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
52 FPS
High - 1080p
--
34 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
26 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro K3000M orGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro K3000M orGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Quadro K3000M
2,4272% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q357% better
11,082.511% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q has 357% better performance than the Quadro K3000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Quadro K3000M is ranked 330th with a score of 2,427, and the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is ranked 169th with a score of 11,082.5.

Performance per dollar
Quadro K3000M
No data available
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro K3000M and the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro K3000M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Quadro T1000 Mobile11,377+369%
Radeon HD 7970M X211,119+358%
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q11,082.5+357%
RTX A500 Mobile10,818+346%
Arc A350M10,730+342%
Radeon HD 6950M2,452+1%
Quadro K620M2,434+0%
Quadro K3000M2,427
FirePro M60002,422-0%
GeForce 940M2,405.5-1%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro K3000M orGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkQuadro K3000MGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
3,016
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
3,070
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
--
45,243.5
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
--
7,779
3DMark 11 Performance Score
2,767
10,471
(+278.42%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
108.1
PassMark G3D Mark
1,638
6,177
(+277.11%)
PassMark G2D Mark
340
(+3.34%)
329
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecQuadro K3000MGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
CodenameGK104TU117
ArchitectureKeplerTuring
Process Size28 nm12 nm
Transistors3,540 million4,700 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecQuadro K3000MGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Memory Size2 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth89.6 Gb/s112.1 Gb/s
Memory Clock700 MHz1,751 MHz
Memory Interface256 bit128 bit
L1 Cache16 KB64 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecQuadro K3000MGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Bus InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)75 W50 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecQuadro K3000MGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
CUDA Cores5761,024
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)316
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)4864
Render Output Units (ROP)3232
Core Clock Speed654 MHz1,020 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)654 MHz1,245 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecQuadro K3000MGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Pixel Fill Rate7.85 GPixel/s39.84 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate31.39 GTexel/s79.68 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance753.4 GFLOPS2.55 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance31.39 GFLOPS79.68 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecQuadro K3000MGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.