NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

VS
Performance
Quadro K2000M
1,7982% of 104,598
GeForce GT 750M41% better
2,5432% of 104,598

The GeForce GT 750M has 41% better performance than the Quadro K2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Quadro K2000M
No data available
GeForce GT 750M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro K2000M and the GeForce GT 750M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Quadro K2000M
Shop GeForce GT 750M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA Quadro K2000M GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro K2000M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2012. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The K2000M has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 28.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The K2000M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 745 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 745 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 55 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The K2000M has the 376th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.72% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2013. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GT 750M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,003 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64.19 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GT 750M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 941 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 967 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GT 750M has the 324th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.43% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoQuadro K2000MGeForce GT 750M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureKeplerKepler
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2012Q1 2013
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
Display FPS for Grand Theft Auto V
GTA V
Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Display FPS for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
CS: GO

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Quadro K2000MGeForce GT 750M
Low - 768p
--
27 FPS
Medium - 768p
--
17 FPS
High - 1080p
--
10 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
9 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro K2000M orGeForce GT 750M
GPUFrames Per Second
Radeon R9 M280X16.6+84%
GeForce MX13013+44%
Quadro M600M12.7+41%
GeForce 940MX11+22%
GeForce MX1109.1+1%
GeForce GT 750M9
Radeon 5308.5-6%
GeForce 940M8-11%
FirePro W4190M7.9-12%
GeForce 930M7.7-14%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro K2000M orGeForce GT 750M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Quadro K2000M
1,7982% of 104,598
GeForce GT 750M41% better
2,5432% of 104,598

The GeForce GT 750M has 41% better performance than the Quadro K2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Quadro K2000M is ranked 376th with a score of 1,798, and the GeForce GT 750M is ranked 324th with a score of 2,543.

Performance per dollar
Quadro K2000M
No data available
GeForce GT 750M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro K2000M and the GeForce GT 750M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro K2000M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon R9 M265X2,633+46%
GeForce 940MX2,556+42%
GeForce GT 750M2,543+41%
Radeon R7 M3702,524+40%
Radeon HD 7850M2,467+37%
Quadro K1100M1,826.5+2%
GeForce GTX 560M1,820+1%
Quadro K2000M1,798
Radeon R5 M3351,784-1%
Radeon R5 M2551,784-1%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro K2000M orGeForce GT 750M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkQuadro K2000MGeForce GT 750M
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
8,766
10,822
(+23.45%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,046
1,574
(+50.48%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
1,995
2,655
(+33.08%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
64.2
PassMark G3D Mark
1,012
1,330
(+31.42%)
PassMark G2D Mark
260
(+5.69%)
246
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
17
22.3
(+31.18%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
17.1
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecQuadro K2000MGeForce GT 750M
CodenameGK107GK107
ArchitectureKeplerKepler
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors1,270 million1,270 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecQuadro K2000MGeForce GT 750M
Memory Size2 GB2 GB
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth28.8 Gb/s64.19 Gb/s
Memory Clock900 MHz1,003 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit128 bit
L1 Cache16 KB16 KB
L2 Cache256 KB256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecQuadro K2000MGeForce GT 750M
Bus InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)55 W50 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecQuadro K2000MGeForce GT 750M
CUDA Cores384384
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)22
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)3232
Render Output Units (ROP)1616
Core Clock Speed745 MHz941 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)745 MHz967 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecQuadro K2000MGeForce GT 750M
Pixel Fill Rate5.96 GPixel/s7.74 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate23.84 GTexel/s30.94 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance572.2 GFLOPS742.7 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance23.84 GFLOPS30.94 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecQuadro K2000MGeForce GT 750M
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.