NVIDIA Quadro K1000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
The GeForce GTX 485M has 146% better performance than the Quadro K1000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro K1000M and the GeForce GTX 485M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the NVIDIA Quadro K1000M GPU
The NVIDIA Quadro K1000M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2012. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The K1000M has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 28.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The K1000M includes 192 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 850 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 45 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The K1000M has the 447th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.05% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2011. It is built on the Fermi GPU microarchitecture (codename GF104) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 485M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 750 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 96 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 485M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 575 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 100 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The GTX 485M has the 314th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.59% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Quadro K1000M | GeForce GTX 485M |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q2 2012 | Q1 2011 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Benchmark Performance
The GeForce GTX 485M has 146% better performance than the Quadro K1000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Quadro K1000M is ranked 447th with a score of 1,102, and the GeForce GTX 485M is ranked 314th with a score of 2,709.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro K1000M and the GeForce GTX 485M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon HD 6970M | 2,818.5 | +156% |
| GeForce GT 755M | 2,800.5 | +154% |
| GeForce GTX 485M | 2,709 | +146% |
| Radeon HD 7870M | 2,702 | +145% |
| GeForce GTX 670M | 2,698 | +145% |
| GeForce GT 635M | 1,110 | +1% |
| GeForce 710M | 1,106.5 | +0% |
| Quadro K1000M | 1,102 | |
| Radeon HD 6570M | 1,067 | -3% |
| Radeon HD 7670M | 1,061.5 | -4% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Quadro K1000M | GeForce GTX 485M |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 1,232 | 2,942 (+138.8%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 780 | 2,360 (+202.56%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 248 | 483 (+94.76%) |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Quadro K1000M | GeForce GTX 485M |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GK107 | GF104 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Transistors | 1,270 million | 1,950 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Quadro K1000M | GeForce GTX 485M |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 28.8 Gb/s | 96 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 900 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Quadro K1000M | GeForce GTX 485M |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 W | 100 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Quadro K1000M | GeForce GTX 485M |
|---|---|---|
| CUDA Cores | 192 | 384 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 1 | 8 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 16 | 64 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 16 | 32 |
| Core Clock Speed | 850 MHz | 575 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Quadro K1000M | GeForce GTX 485M |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 3.4 GPixel/s | 9.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 13.6 GTexel/s | 36.8 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 326.4 GFLOPS | 883.2 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 13.6 GFLOPS | 73.6 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Quadro K1000M | GeForce GTX 485M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 5.1 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.