PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

NVIDIA Quadro 4000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

NVIDIA
VS
NVIDIA
Performance
Quadro 4000M
2,0922% of 104,737
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q452% better
11,53811% of 104,737

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q has 452% better performance than the Quadro 4000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Quadro 4000M
No data available
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro 4000M and the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Quadro 4000M
Shop GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA Quadro 4000M GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro 4000M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2011. It is built on the Fermi GPU microarchitecture (codename GF104) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.

Memory

The 4000M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 625 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 80 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 4000M includes 336 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 475 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 56 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 100 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The 4000M has the 358th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.00% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2020. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU117) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,250 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 160 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q includes 1,024 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,035 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,200 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q has the 165th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 11.02% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoQuadro 4000MGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureFermiTuring
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2011Q2 2020
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Crysis Remastered
Crysis Remastered
Display FPS for Cyberpunk 2077 (1.0)
Cyberpunk 2077 (1.0)
Display FPS for Immortals Fenyx Rising
Immortals Fenyx Rising
Display FPS for Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
Display FPS for Yakuza: Like a Dragon
Yakuza: Like a Dragon
Display FPS for Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Display FPS for Watch Dogs: Legion
Watch Dogs: Legion

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Crysis Remastered
Crysis Remastered
Quadro 4000MGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Low - 720p
--
154 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
60 FPS
High - 1080p
--
32 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
24 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro 4000M orGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro 4000M orGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Quadro 4000M
2,0922% of 104,737
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q452% better
11,53811% of 104,737

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q has 452% better performance than the Quadro 4000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Quadro 4000M is ranked 358th with a score of 2,092, and the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is ranked 165th with a score of 11,538.

Performance per dollar
Quadro 4000M
No data available
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro 4000M and the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro 4000M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Arc A370M12,089.5+478%
Quadro M5000M11,845+466%
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q11,538+452%
Quadro T2000 Max-Q11,461+448%
Quadro T1000 Mobile11,377+444%
GeForce GT 650M2,111.5+1%
Radeon HD 7770M2,110+1%
Quadro 4000M2,092
Radeon HD 7750M2,085-0%
Radeon R7 M3602,029-3%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro 4000M orGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkQuadro 4000MGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
3,098
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
3,235.5
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
--
47,657
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
--
8,564
3DMark 11 Performance Score
2,334.5
11,398
(+388.24%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
140
PassMark G3D Mark
1,302
6,404
(+391.86%)
PassMark G2D Mark
270
336
(+24.44%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecQuadro 4000MGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
CodenameGF104TU117
ArchitectureFermiTuring
Process Size40 nm12 nm
Transistors1,950 million4,700 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecQuadro 4000MGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Memory Size2 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth80 Gb/s160 Gb/s
Memory Clock625 MHz1,250 MHz
Memory Interface256 bit128 bit
L1 Cache64 KB64 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecQuadro 4000MGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Bus InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)100 W50 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecQuadro 4000MGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
CUDA Cores3361,024
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)716
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)5664
Render Output Units (ROP)3232
Core Clock Speed475 MHz1,035 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--1,200 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecQuadro 4000MGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Pixel Fill Rate6.65 GPixel/s38.4 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate26.6 GTexel/s76.8 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance638.4 GFLOPS2.46 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance53.2 GFLOPS76.8 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecQuadro 4000MGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
OpenCL1.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model5.16.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.