NVIDIA Quadro 4000M vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

VS
Performance
Quadro 4000M
2,0922% of 104,598
Radeon RX Vega 561,290% better
29,08628% of 104,598

The Radeon RX Vega 56 has 1,290% better performance than the Quadro 4000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Quadro 4000M
No data available
Radeon RX Vega 56
72.945% of 161.45

The Radeon RX Vega 56 has 45% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.

Shop Quadro 4000M
Shop Radeon RX Vega 56
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA Quadro 4000M GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro 4000M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2011. It is built on the Fermi GPU microarchitecture (codename GF104) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.

Memory

The 4000M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 625 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 80 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 4000M includes 336 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 475 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 56 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 100 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The 4000M has the 358th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.00% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 GPU

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q3 2017 with a MSRP of $399. It is built on the GCN 5.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Vega 10) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The RX Vega 56 has 8 GB of HBM2 memory, with a 800 MHz memory clock and a 2,048 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 409.6 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RX Vega 56 includes 3,584 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,156 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,471 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 224 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The RX Vega 56 occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 550 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 210 W.

Benchmark Performance & Value

The RX Vega 56 has the 81st best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 27.81% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 29,086 score and $399 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 72.9. This is the 42nd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoQuadro 4000MRadeon RX Vega 56
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureFermiGCN 5.0
Market SegmentMobileDesktop
Release DateQ1 2011Q3 2017
Launch Price (MSRP)--$399
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Tom Clancy's The Division 2
The Division 2
Display FPS for Dirt Rally 2.0
Dirt Rally 2.0
Display FPS for Anthem
Anthem
Display FPS for Far Cry New Dawn
Far Cry New Dawn
Display FPS for Metro Exodus
Metro Exodus
Display FPS for Apex Legends
Apex Legends
Display FPS for Just Cause 4
Just Cause 4

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Tom Clancy's The Division 2
The Division 2
Quadro 4000MRadeon RX Vega 56
Low - 720p
--
163 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
123 FPS
High - 1080p
--
95 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
75 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
58 FPS
4K UHD - 2160p
--
30 FPS
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro 4000M orRadeon RX Vega 56

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro 4000M orRadeon RX Vega 56

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Quadro 4000M
2,0922% of 104,598
Radeon RX Vega 561,290% better
29,08628% of 104,598

The Radeon RX Vega 56 has 1,290% better performance than the Quadro 4000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Quadro 4000M is ranked 358th with a score of 2,092, and the Radeon RX Vega 56 is ranked 81st with a score of 29,086.

Performance per dollar
Quadro 4000M
No data available
Radeon RX Vega 56
72.945% of 161.45

The Radeon RX Vega 56 has 111% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

Radeon RX Vega 56's 72.9 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro 4000M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER29,668+1,318%
GeForce GTX 108029,263+1,299%
Radeon RX Vega 5629,086+1,290%
GeForce RTX 306028,375+1,256%
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti27,503+1,215%
GeForce GT 650M2,111.5+1%
Radeon HD 7770M2,110+1%
Quadro 4000M2,092
Radeon HD 7750M2,085-0%
Radeon R7 M3602,029-3%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro 4000M orRadeon RX Vega 56

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkQuadro 4000MRadeon RX Vega 56
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
6,482
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
6,746
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
--
125,359
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
--
20,759
3DMark 11 Performance Score
2,334.5
22,937
(+882.52%)
PassMark G3D Mark
1,302
13,228
(+915.98%)
PassMark G2D Mark
276
761
(+175.72%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecQuadro 4000MRadeon RX Vega 56
CodenameGF104Vega 10
ArchitectureFermiGCN 5.0
Process Size40 nm14 nm
Transistors1,950 million12,500 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecQuadro 4000MRadeon RX Vega 56
Memory Size2 GB8 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5HBM2
Memory Bandwidth80 Gb/s409.6 Gb/s
Memory Clock625 MHz800 MHz
Memory Interface256 bit2,048 bit
L1 Cache64 KB16 KB
L2 Cache512 KB4 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecQuadro 4000MRadeon RX Vega 56
Slots--2 slots
Bus InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)100 W210 W
Suggested PSU--550 W
Power Connectors--2x 8-pin
OutputsDevice DependentHDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4a

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecQuadro 4000MRadeon RX Vega 56
Stream Processors (SP)--3,584
CUDA Cores336--
Compute Units (CU)--56
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)7--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)56224
Render Output Units (ROP)3264
Core Clock Speed475 MHz1,156 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--1,471 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecQuadro 4000MRadeon RX Vega 56
Pixel Fill Rate6.65 GPixel/s94.14 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate26.6 GTexel/s329.5 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance638.4 GFLOPS10.54 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance53.2 GFLOPS659 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecQuadro 4000MRadeon RX Vega 56
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
OpenCL1.12.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model5.16.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.