NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs Intel Arc A770M
The Arc A770M has 2,329% better performance than the Quadro 3000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro 3000M and the Arc A770M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the NVIDIA Quadro 3000M GPU
The NVIDIA Quadro 3000M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2011. It is built on the Fermi GPU microarchitecture (codename GF104) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.
Memory
The 3000M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 625 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 80 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The 3000M includes 240 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 450 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The 3000M has the 406th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.47% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the Intel Arc A770M GPU
The Intel Arc A770M is a mobile graphics card that launched in 2022. It is built on the Generation 12.7 GPU microarchitecture (codename DG2-512) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.
Memory
The Arc A770M has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 2,000 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 512 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Arc A770M includes 4,096 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,650 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,050 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 256 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 128 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 512 Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX) optimized for AI workloads and 32 ray tracing units dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 120 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The Arc A770M has the 48th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 35.68% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Quadro 3000M | Arc A770M |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | Intel |
| Architecture | Fermi | Generation 12.7 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q1 2011 | 2022 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
F1 24 | Quadro 3000M | Arc A770M |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 229 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 196 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 151 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 49 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | 91 | +85% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | 70 | +43% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile | 60 | +22% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | 59 | +20% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | 58 | +18% |
| Arc A770M | 49.1 | |
| GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | 45 | -8% |
| Radeon RX 7600S | 39 | -21% |
| Arc A730M | 32 | -35% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | 31 | -37% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Arc A770M has 2,329% better performance than the Quadro 3000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Quadro 3000M is ranked 406th with a score of 1,539, and the Arc A770M is ranked 48th with a score of 37,375.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro 3000M and the Arc A770M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | 37,933 | +2,365% |
| Radeon RX 7700S | 37,918 | +2,364% |
| Arc A770M | 37,375 | +2,329% |
| Radeon RX 7600M XT | 37,202 | +2,317% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | 36,969.5 | +2,302% |
| Radeon HD 8690M | 1,600 | +4% |
| Radeon R5 M240 | 1,588 | +3% |
| Quadro 3000M | 1,539 | |
| Radeon HD 7730M | 1,478 | -4% |
| Radeon HD 6850M | 1,469.5 | -5% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Quadro 3000M | Arc A770M |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 10,783 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 10,997 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | -- | 124,487 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | -- | 25,563 |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | -- | 112,098 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 1,742 | 29,170 (+1,574.51%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | -- | 216.5 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 994 | 11,539 (+1,060.87%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 310 | 716 (+130.97%) |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Quadro 3000M | Arc A770M |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GF104 | DG2-512 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Size | 40 nm | 6 nm |
| Transistors | 1,950 million | 21,700 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Quadro 3000M | Arc A770M |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 2 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 Gb/s | 512 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 625 MHz | 2,000 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 6 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 16 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Quadro 3000M | Arc A770M |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 W | 120 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Quadro 3000M | Arc A770M |
|---|---|---|
| Shading Units | -- | 4,096 |
| CUDA Cores | 240 | -- |
| Execution Units (EU) | -- | 4,096 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 5 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 40 | 256 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 32 | 128 |
| Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX) | -- | 512 |
| Ray Tracing Units (RTU) | -- | 32 |
| Core Clock Speed | 450 MHz | 1,650 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | -- | 2,050 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Quadro 3000M | Arc A770M |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 4.5 GPixel/s | 262.4 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 18 GTexel/s | 524.8 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 432 GFLOPS | 16.79 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 36 GFLOPS | -- |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Quadro 3000M | Arc A770M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.6 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.