NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

VS
Performance
Quadro 2000M
1,2611% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile1,495% better
20,118.519% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 1,495% better performance than the Quadro 2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Quadro 2000M
No data available
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro 2000M and the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Quadro 2000M
Shop GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA Quadro 2000M GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro 2000M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2011. It is built on the Fermi GPU microarchitecture (codename GF106) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.

Memory

The 2000M has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 28.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 2000M includes 192 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 550 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 55 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The 2000M has the 427th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.21% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2019. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU116) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 192 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 288 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 1660 Ti Mobile includes 1,536 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,455 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,590 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 96 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 48 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 80 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has the 110th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 19.23% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoQuadro 2000MGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureFermiTuring
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2011Q2 2019
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Skull & Bones
Skull & Bones
Display FPS for Enshrouded
Enshrouded
Display FPS for Palworld
Palworld
Display FPS for Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Display FPS for Ready or Not
Ready or Not
Display FPS for The Finals
The Finals

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Quadro 2000MGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Low - 1080p
--
73 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
56 FPS
High - 1080p
--
55 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
54 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro 2000M orGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro 2000M orGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Quadro 2000M
1,2611% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile1,495% better
20,118.519% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 1,495% better performance than the Quadro 2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Quadro 2000M is ranked 427th with a score of 1,261, and the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is ranked 110th with a score of 20,118.5.

Performance per dollar
Quadro 2000M
No data available
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro 2000M and the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro 2000M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q22,089+1,652%
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile21,261.5+1,586%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile20,118.5+1,495%
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile19,878.5+1,476%
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q19,778.5+1,468%
Radeon HD 8550M1,307+4%
GeForce 820M1,266.5+0%
Quadro 2000M1,261
GeForce GT 640M LE1,259-0%
Radeon HD 8570M1,255-0%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro 2000M orGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkQuadro 2000MGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
5,659
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
5,697
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
--
97,517
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
--
14,818
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
--
66,325
3DMark 11 Performance Score
1,421
17,351
(+1,121.04%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
120.6
PassMark G3D Mark
778
10,190
(+1,209.77%)
PassMark G2D Mark
232
487
(+109.91%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecQuadro 2000MGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
CodenameGF106TU116
ArchitectureFermiTuring
Process Size40 nm12 nm
Transistors1,170 million6,600 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecQuadro 2000MGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Memory Size2 GB6 GB
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth28.8 Gb/s288 Gb/s
Memory Clock900 MHz1,500 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit192 bit
L1 Cache64 KB64 KB
L2 Cache256 KB1,536 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecQuadro 2000MGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Bus InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)55 W80 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecQuadro 2000MGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
CUDA Cores1921,536
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)424
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)3296
Render Output Units (ROP)1648
Core Clock Speed550 MHz1,455 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--1,590 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecQuadro 2000MGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Pixel Fill Rate4.4 GPixel/s76.32 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate17.6 GTexel/s152.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance422.4 GFLOPS4.88 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance35.2 GFLOPS152.6 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecQuadro 2000MGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
OpenCL1.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model5.16.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.