NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs AMD Radeon R9 M275

VS
Performance
Quadro 2000M
1,2611% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M275159% better
3,2613% of 104,598

The Radeon R9 M275 has 159% better performance than the Quadro 2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Quadro 2000M
No data available
Radeon R9 M275
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro 2000M and the Radeon R9 M275 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Quadro 2000M
Shop Radeon R9 M275
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA Quadro 2000M GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro 2000M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2011. It is built on the Fermi GPU microarchitecture (codename GF106) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.

Memory

The 2000M has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 28.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 2000M includes 192 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 550 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 55 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The 2000M has the 427th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.21% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon R9 M275 GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 M275 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2014. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Venus) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 M275 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,000 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 M275 includes 640 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 900 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 925 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Benchmark Performance

The R9 M275 has the 290th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.12% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoQuadro 2000MRadeon R9 M275
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureFermiGCN 1.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2011Q1 2014
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Quadro 2000MRadeon R9 M275
Low - 720p
--
88 FPS
Medium - 768p
--
52 FPS
High - 768p
--
43 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
14 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro 2000M orRadeon R9 M275
GPUFrames Per Second
Quadro K1100M15.4+7%
GeForce 940M15+4%
Quadro K620M15+4%
GeForce 920MX15+4%
FirePro W4190M15+4%
Radeon R9 M27514.4
Quadro M500M14-3%
GeForce 840M14-3%
Quadro K2100M14-3%
GeForce 845M13.9-3%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro 2000M orRadeon R9 M275
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Quadro 2000M
1,2611% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M275159% better
3,2613% of 104,598

The Radeon R9 M275 has 159% better performance than the Quadro 2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Quadro 2000M is ranked 427th with a score of 1,261, and the Radeon R9 M275 is ranked 290th with a score of 3,261.

Performance per dollar
Quadro 2000M
No data available
Radeon R9 M275
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro 2000M and the Radeon R9 M275 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro 2000M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon R9 M3753,314+163%
GeForce 945M3,309.5+162%
Radeon R9 M2753,261+159%
Radeon HD 6990M3,227+156%
GeForce GTX 675M3,218+155%
Radeon HD 8550M1,307+4%
GeForce 820M1,266.5+0%
Quadro 2000M1,261
GeForce GT 640M LE1,259-0%
Radeon HD 8570M1,255-0%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Quadro 2000M orRadeon R9 M275
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkQuadro 2000MRadeon R9 M275
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
--
11,459
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
--
1,885
3DMark 11 Performance Score
1,421
3,182
(+123.93%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
50.5
PassMark G3D Mark
778
1,115
(+43.32%)
PassMark G2D Mark
232
561
(+141.81%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecQuadro 2000MRadeon R9 M275
CodenameGF106Venus
ArchitectureFermiGCN 1.0
Process Size40 nm28 nm
Transistors1,170 million1,500 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecQuadro 2000MRadeon R9 M275
Memory Size2 GB2 GB
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth28.8 Gb/s64 Gb/s
Memory Clock900 MHz1,000 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit128 bit
L1 Cache64 KB16 KB
L2 Cache256 KB256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecQuadro 2000MRadeon R9 M275
Bus InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)55 W--
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecQuadro 2000MRadeon R9 M275
Stream Processors (SP)--640
CUDA Cores192--
Compute Units (CU)--10
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)4--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)3240
Render Output Units (ROP)1616
Core Clock Speed550 MHz900 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--925 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecQuadro 2000MRadeon R9 M275
Pixel Fill Rate4.4 GPixel/s14.8 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate17.6 GTexel/s37 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance422.4 GFLOPS1,184 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance35.2 GFLOPS74 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecQuadro 2000MRadeon R9 M275
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
OpenCL1.12.1 (1.2)
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model5.16.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.