NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs AMD Radeon R5 M240
The Radeon R5 M240 has 26% better performance than the Quadro 2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro 2000M and the Radeon R5 M240 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the NVIDIA Quadro 2000M GPU
The NVIDIA Quadro 2000M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2011. It is built on the Fermi GPU microarchitecture (codename GF106) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.
Memory
The 2000M has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 28.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The 2000M includes 192 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 550 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 55 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The 2000M has the 427th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.20% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD Radeon R5 M240 GPU
The AMD Radeon R5 M240 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q3 2014. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Jet) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The R5 M240 has 1,024 MB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R5 M240 includes 320 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,030 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 20 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Benchmark Performance
The R5 M240 has the 403rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.52% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Quadro 2000M | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q1 2011 | Q3 2014 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
The Witcher 3 | Quadro 2000M | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | -- | 18 FPS |
| Medium - 768p | -- | 12 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon R7 M340 | 13 | +8% |
| Radeon R7 M360 | 13 | +8% |
| Radeon R5 M255 | 12.9 | +8% |
| Radeon R7 M260 | 12.8 | +7% |
| GeForce GT 740M | 12.1 | +1% |
| Radeon R5 M240 | 12 | |
| GeForce 920M | 12 | +0% |
| Radeon R5 M335 | 11.3 | -6% |
| Radeon R5 M330 | 10.7 | -11% |
| GeForce GT 720M | 9 | -25% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Radeon R5 M240 has 26% better performance than the Quadro 2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Quadro 2000M is ranked 427th with a score of 1,261, and the Radeon R5 M240 is ranked 403rd with a score of 1,588.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Quadro 2000M and the Radeon R5 M240 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 460M | 1,623 | +29% |
| Radeon HD 8690M | 1,600 | +27% |
| Radeon R5 M240 | 1,588 | +26% |
| Quadro 3000M | 1,539 | +22% |
| Radeon HD 7730M | 1,478 | +17% |
| Radeon HD 8550M | 1,307 | +4% |
| GeForce 820M | 1,266.5 | +0% |
| Quadro 2000M | 1,261 | |
| GeForce GT 640M LE | 1,259 | -0% |
| Radeon HD 8570M | 1,255 | -0% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Quadro 2000M | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | -- | 5,500 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | -- | 949 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 1,421 | 1,669 (+17.45%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | -- | 26.9 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 780 (+73.33%) | 450 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 235 (+46.88%) | 160 |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Quadro 2000M | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GF106 | Jet |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Size | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 1,170 million | 690 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Quadro 2000M | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 2 GB | 1,024 MB |
| Memory Type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 28.8 Gb/s | 14.4 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 900 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 128 bit | 64 bit |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 16 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 128 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Quadro 2000M | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 W | -- |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Quadro 2000M | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 320 |
| CUDA Cores | 192 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 5 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 4 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 32 | 20 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 16 | 8 |
| Core Clock Speed | 550 MHz | 1,000 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | -- | 1,030 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Quadro 2000M | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 4.4 GPixel/s | 8.24 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 17.6 GTexel/s | 20.6 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 422.4 GFLOPS | 659.2 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 35.2 GFLOPS | 41.2 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Quadro 2000M | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 (1.2) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 (5.1) |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.