NVIDIA NVS 4200M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

VS
Performance
NVS 4200M
5070% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 965M1,344% better
7,3227% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 965M has 1,344% better performance than the NVS 4200M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
NVS 4200M
No data available
GeForce GTX 965M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the NVS 4200M and the GeForce GTX 965M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop NVS 4200M
Shop GeForce GTX 965M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA NVS 4200M GPU

The NVIDIA NVS 4200M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2011. It is built on the Fermi 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GF119S) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.

Memory

The NVS 4200M has 1,024 MB of DDR3 memory, with a 800 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 12.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The NVS 4200M includes 48 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 810 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 8 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 4 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 25 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The NVS 4200M has the 516th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.48% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2015. It is built on the Maxwell 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GM204) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 965M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,253 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 80.19 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 965M includes 1,024 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 924 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 950 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 965M has the 215th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.00% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoNVS 4200MGeForce GTX 965M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureFermi 2.0Maxwell 2.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2011Q1 2015
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 2020
F1 2020
Display FPS for Gears Tactics
Gears Tactics
Display FPS for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3
Display FPS for Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Display FPS for Need for Speed Heat
NFS Heat
Display FPS for FIFA 20
FIFA 20
Display FPS for Control
Control

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 2020
F1 2020
NVS 4200MGeForce GTX 965M
Low - 720p
--
97 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
46 FPS
High - 1080p
--
34 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
23 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
18 FPS
4K UHD - 2160p
--
9 FPS
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:NVS 4200M orGeForce GTX 965M

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:NVS 4200M orGeForce GTX 965M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
NVS 4200M
5070% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 965M1,344% better
7,3227% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 965M has 1,344% better performance than the NVS 4200M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The NVS 4200M is ranked 516th with a score of 507, and the GeForce GTX 965M is ranked 215th with a score of 7,322.

Performance per dollar
NVS 4200M
No data available
GeForce GTX 965M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the NVS 4200M and the GeForce GTX 965M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:NVS 4200M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon Pro 560X7,590+1,397%
Quadro M22007,372+1,354%
GeForce GTX 965M7,322+1,344%
GeForce GTX 870M7,156+1,311%
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q7,153.5+1,311%
Radeon HD 7470M522+3%
GeForce 610M507.5+0%
NVS 4200M507
GeForce GT 520M502-1%
Radeon HD 6450M443-13%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:NVS 4200M orGeForce GTX 965M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkNVS 4200MGeForce GTX 965M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
1,810
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
1,952
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
--
34,748
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
--
5,536
3DMark 11 Performance Score
572
7,896
(+1,280.42%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
93.9
PassMark G3D Mark
281
3,794
(+1,250.18%)
PassMark G2D Mark
77
335
(+335.06%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
--
66.3
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecNVS 4200MGeForce GTX 965M
CodenameGF119SGM204
ArchitectureFermi 2.0Maxwell 2.0
Process Size40 nm28 nm
Transistors292 million5,200 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecNVS 4200MGeForce GTX 965M
Memory Size1,024 MB2 GB
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth12.8 Gb/s80.19 Gb/s
Memory Clock800 MHz1,253 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit128 bit
L1 Cache64 KB48 KB
L2 Cache128 KB1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecNVS 4200MGeForce GTX 965M
Bus InterfaceMXMMXM-B (3.0)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)25 W50 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecNVS 4200MGeForce GTX 965M
CUDA Cores481,024
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)1--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)864
Render Output Units (ROP)432
Core Clock Speed810 MHz924 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--950 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecNVS 4200MGeForce GTX 965M
Pixel Fill Rate1.62 GPixel/s30.4 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate6.48 GTexel/s60.8 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance155.5 GFLOPS1.95 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance12.96 GFLOPS60.8 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecNVS 4200MGeForce GTX 965M
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
OpenCL1.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model5.16.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.