NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16 GB) vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
The Radeon RX 6800 has 12% better performance than the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16 GB) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16 GB) has 20% better value for the money than the Radeon RX 6800 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16 GB) GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16 GB) is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q2 2025 with a MSRP of $429. It is built on the Blackwell 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GB206) and is manufactured on a 5 nm process.
Memory
The RTX 5060 Ti has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory, with a 1,750 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 448 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RTX 5060 Ti includes 4,608 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 2,407 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,572 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 144 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 48 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 144 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 36 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The RTX 5060 Ti occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports HDMI 2.1b, DisplayPort 2.1b display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 450 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 180 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The RTX 5060 Ti has the 35th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 566 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 39.61% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090. Its 51,400 score and $429 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 119.81. This is the 12th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
About the AMD Radeon RX 6800 GPU
The AMD Radeon RX 6800 is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q4 2020 with a MSRP of $579. It is built on the RDNA 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Navi 21) and is manufactured on a 7 nm process.
Memory
The RX 6800 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 2,000 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 512 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RX 6800 includes 3,840 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,700 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,105 MHz. It usually operates at 1,815 MHz during typical gaming workloads. Complementing the processing units are 240 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 96 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 60 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The RX 6800 occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a, USB Type-C display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 600 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 250 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The RX 6800 has the 31st best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 566 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 44.53% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090. Its 57,784 score and $579 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 99.8. This is the 28th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16 GB) | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q2 2025 | Q4 2020 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $429 | $579 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
God of War Ragnarök | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16 GB) | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | 207 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | 179 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 159 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 147 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | 110 FPS | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | 63 FPS | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 9070 | 94 | +50% |
| Radeon RX 7900 XT | 86.1 | +37% |
| GeForce RTX 5070 | 81.5 | +30% |
| GeForce RTX 3090 | 74.6 | +19% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | 67.4 | +7% |
| GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16 GB) | 62.7 | |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | 58 | -7% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | 39 | -38% |
| GeForce RTX 5060 | 36.6 | -42% |
| Arc B580 | 33.8 | -46% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 9070 | 5.84 | -15% |
| GeForce RTX 5070 | 6.74 | -2% |
| GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16 GB) | 6.84 | |
| GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | 6.87 | +0% |
| Arc B580 | 7.37 | +8% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | 7.67 | +12% |
| GeForce RTX 5080 | 7.74 | +13% |
| GeForce RTX 5060 | 8.17 | +19% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | 8.89 | +30% |
Benchmark Performance
The Radeon RX 6800 has 12% better performance than the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16 GB) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16 GB) is ranked 35th with a score of 51,400, and the Radeon RX 6800 is ranked 31st with a score of 57,784.
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16 GB) has 20% better value for the money than the Radeon RX 6800 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16 GB) is ranked 12th with a performance per dollar of 119.81, and the Radeon RX 6800 is ranked 28th with a performance per dollar of 99.8.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4070 | 59,986 | +17% |
| Radeon RX 6900 XT | 59,119 | +15% |
| Radeon RX 6800 | 57,784 | +12% |
| Radeon RX 7700 XT | 57,340 | +12% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 (12 GB) | 56,634 | +10% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 | 53,713 | +5% |
| Radeon RX 6800 XT | 52,046 | +1% |
| GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16 GB) | 51,400 | |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | 49,588 | -4% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) | 47,803 | -7% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4060 | 126.34 | +5% |
| Arc A770 | 125.54 | +5% |
| GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16 GB) | 119.81 | |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) | 119.81 | -0% |
| GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | 114.57 | -4% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | 114.15 | -5% |
| Radeon RX 6600 XT | 103.04 | -14% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | 100.14 | -16% |
| Radeon RX 6800 | 99.8 | -17% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 95.09 | -21% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16 GB) | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 15,854.5 | 16,242 (+2.44%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 16,219 | 16,235 (+0.1%) |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 188,114 | 197,365 (+4.92%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 42,064.5 | 44,613.5 (+6.06%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | 182,657 (+2.92%) | 177,472 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 47,632 (+3.17%) | 46,167 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 22,789 (+3.07%) | 22,111 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 1,227 (+23.44%) | 994 |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16 GB) | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GB206 | Navi 21 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Size | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Transistors | 21,900 million | 26,800 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16 GB) | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 Gb/s | 512 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,750 MHz | 2,000 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 4 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16 GB) | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 2 slots | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 W | 250 W |
| Suggested PSU | 450 W | 600 W |
| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Outputs | HDMI 2.1b, DisplayPort 2.1b | HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a, USB Type-C |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16 GB) | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 3,840 |
| CUDA Cores | 4,608 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 60 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 36 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 144 | 240 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 48 | 96 |
| Tensor Cores | 144 | -- |
| Ray Accelerators | -- | 60 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | -- |
| Core Clock Speed | 2,407 MHz | 1,700 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 2,572 MHz | 2,105 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Game) | -- | 1,815 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16 GB) | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | 202.1 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 370.4 GTexel/s | 505.2 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 23.7 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 370.4 GFLOPS | 1,010.4 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16 GB) | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.