NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER has 821% better performance than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER has 28% better value for the money than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q1 2024 with a MSRP of $999. It is built on the Ada Lovelace GPU microarchitecture (codename AD103) and is manufactured on a 5 nm process.
Memory
The RTX 4080 SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory, with a 1,438 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 736.3 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RTX 4080 SUPER includes 10,240 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 2,295 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,550 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 320 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 112 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 320 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 80 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The RTX 4080 SUPER is a large graphics card, occupying 3 PCIe 4.0 x16 expansion slots. It supports HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. With a thermal design power (TDP) of 320 W and a large, 3-slot size, it is recommended to use a power supply of 700 W and a case with sufficient space to accommodate the card. Compare your card's model and your case's dimensions to verify compatibility.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The RTX 4080 SUPER has the 2nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 83.12% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 87,055 score and $999 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 87.14. This is the 27th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q4 2016 with a MSRP of $139. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP107) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 1050 Ti has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,752 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 112.1 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 1050 Ti includes 768 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,291 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,392 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GTX 1050 Ti occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 250 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The GTX 1050 Ti has the 186th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.03% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 9,453 score and $139 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 68.01. This is the 47th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q1 2024 | Q4 2016 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $999 | $139 |
| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Sons of the Forest | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | 145 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | 141 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 137 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 135 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | 132 FPS | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | 103 FPS | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | 103 | |
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | 103 | +0% |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | 92.3 | -10% |
| Radeon RX 7900 XT | 86 | -17% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | 82.7 | -20% |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | 77.6 | -25% |
| GeForce RTX 3090 | 75 | -27% |
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | 70 | -32% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 | 69.5 | -33% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4060 | 7.83 | -19% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) | 7.98 | -18% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 8.85 | -9% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16 GB) | 9.65 | +-0% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | 9.66 | +-0% |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | 9.7 | |
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | 9.7 | +0% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 | 9.88 | +2% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | 10.03 | +3% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 | 10.06 | +4% |
Benchmark Performance
The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER has 821% better performance than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is ranked 2nd with a score of 87,055, and the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is ranked 186th with a score of 9,453.
The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER has 28% better value for the money than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is ranked 27th with a performance per dollar of 87.14, and the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is ranked 47th with a performance per dollar of 68.01.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4090 | 104,737 | +20% |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | 87,055 | |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | 86,267 | -1% |
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | 83,322 | -4% |
| Radeon RX 7900 XT | 75,896 | -13% |
| GeForce GTX 960 | 10,767.5 | -88% |
| GeForce GTX 680 | 10,216.5 | -88% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 9,453 | -89% |
| GeForce GTX 590 | 9,166.5 | -89% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 | 8,571 | -90% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | 94.63 | +9% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | 93.66 | +7% |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | 87.14 | |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16 GB) | 86.4 | -1% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | 86.25 | -1% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 | 78.63 | -10% |
| Radeon RX 480 | 78.25 | -10% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 68.01 | -22% |
| Radeon R9 380 | 61.26 | -30% |
| GeForce GT 1030 | 59.84 | -31% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 28,378 (+1,129.28%) | 2,308.5 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 27,111 (+955.72%) | 2,568 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 187,847 (+268.77%) | 50,939 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 59,075 (+689.25%) | 7,485 |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | 235,474 | -- |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 59,568 (+528.32%) | 9,480.5 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | -- | 150.4 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 34,209 (+441.71%) | 6,315 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 1,203 (+87.38%) | 642 |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | AD103 | GP107 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
| Process Size | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Transistors | 45,900 million | 3,300 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 16 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 736.3 Gb/s | 112.1 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,438 MHz | 1,752 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 256 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB | 1,024 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 3 slots | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 320 W | 75 W |
| Suggested PSU | 700 W | 250 W |
| Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin | -- |
| Outputs | HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a | DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| CUDA Cores | 10,240 | 768 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 80 | 6 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 320 | 48 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 112 | 32 |
| Tensor Cores | 320 | -- |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 80 | -- |
| Core Clock Speed | 2,295 MHz | 1,291 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 2,550 MHz | 1,392 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 285.6 GPixel/s | 44.54 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 816 GTexel/s | 66.82 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 52.22 TFLOPS | 2.14 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 816 GFLOPS | 66.82 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.