NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 448% better performance than the GeForce GTX 1650 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 2% better value for the money than the GeForce GTX 1650 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q1 2024 with a MSRP of $799. It is built on the Ada Lovelace GPU microarchitecture (codename AD103) and is manufactured on a 5 nm process.
Memory
The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory, with a 1,313 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 672.3 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER includes 8,448 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 2,340 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,610 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 264 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 96 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 264 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 66 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a large graphics card, occupying 3 PCIe 4.0 x16 expansion slots. It supports HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. With a thermal design power (TDP) of 285 W and a large, 3-slot size, it is recommended to use a power supply of 600 W and a case with sufficient space to accommodate the card. Compare your card's model and your case's dimensions to verify compatibility.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has the 7th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 71.45% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 74,834 score and $799 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 93.66. This is the 23rd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q2 2019 with a MSRP of $149. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU117) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 1650 has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 2,001 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 128.1 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 1650 includes 896 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,485 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,665 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 56 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GTX 1650 occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 250 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The GTX 1650 has the 151st best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 13.03% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 13,645 score and $149 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 91.58. This is the 24th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q1 2024 | Q2 2019 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $799 | $149 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | 163 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 142 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 113 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | 77 FPS | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | 40 FPS | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | 49 | +23% |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | 47 | +18% |
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | 46 | +16% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | 39.8 | |
| Radeon RX 7900 XT | 39 | -2% |
| GeForce RTX 3090 | 34 | -15% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | 34 | -15% |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | 31 | -22% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 (12 GB) | 30 | -25% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | 17.21 | -14% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | 17.62 | -12% |
| Radeon RX 7700 XT | 19.52 | -3% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | 20.08 | |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | 20.39 | +2% |
| Arc A770 | 20.56 | +2% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 | 21.7 | +8% |
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | 21.72 | +8% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 22.17 | +10% |
Benchmark Performance
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 448% better performance than the GeForce GTX 1650 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is ranked 7th with a score of 74,834, and the GeForce GTX 1650 is ranked 151st with a score of 13,645.
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 2% better value for the money than the GeForce GTX 1650 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is ranked 23rd with a performance per dollar of 93.66, and the GeForce GTX 1650 is ranked 24th with a performance per dollar of 91.58.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 7900 XT | 75,896 | +1% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | 75,612 | +1% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | 74,834 | |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | 72,227.5 | -3% |
| GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | 69,481 | -7% |
| GeForce GTX 970 | 16,033 | -79% |
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 15,619 | -79% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 13,645 | -82% |
| Radeon R9 380 | 12,191 | -84% |
| Radeon R9 280X | 10,792 | -86% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1660 | 96.49 | +3% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 95.98 | +2% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 95.09 | +2% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | 94.63 | +1% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | 93.66 | |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 91.58 | -2% |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | 87.14 | -7% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16 GB) | 86.4 | -8% |
| Radeon RX 590 | 83.74 | -11% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 | 78.63 | -16% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 23,695 (+574.69%) | 3,512 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 23,540 (+506.86%) | 3,879 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 165,604 (+227.61%) | 50,549 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 52,738 (+473.05%) | 9,203 |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | 209,177 (+374.85%) | 44,051.5 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 54,278 (+290.66%) | 13,894 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 317 (+81.66%) | 174.5 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 31,687 (+302.27%) | 7,877 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 1,185 (+109.36%) | 566 |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | AD103 | TU117 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Size | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Transistors | 45,900 million | 4,700 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 16 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 672.3 Gb/s | 128.1 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,313 MHz | 2,001 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 256 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 1,024 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 3 slots | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 285 W | 75 W |
| Suggested PSU | 600 W | 250 W |
| Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin | -- |
| Outputs | HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a | DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| CUDA Cores | 8,448 | 896 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 66 | 14 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 264 | 56 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 96 | 32 |
| Tensor Cores | 264 | -- |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 66 | -- |
| Core Clock Speed | 2,340 MHz | 1,485 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 2,610 MHz | 1,665 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 250.6 GPixel/s | 53.28 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 689 GTexel/s | 93.24 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 44.1 TFLOPS | 2.98 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 689 GFLOPS | 93.24 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.