NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 333% better performance than the Radeon R9 Nano for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 252% better value for the money than the Radeon R9 Nano for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q1 2024 with a MSRP of $799. It is built on the Ada Lovelace GPU microarchitecture (codename AD103) and is manufactured on a 5 nm process.
Memory
The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory, with a 1,313 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 672.3 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER includes 8,448 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 2,340 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,610 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 264 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 96 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 264 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 66 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a large graphics card, occupying 3 PCIe 4.0 x16 expansion slots. It supports HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. With a thermal design power (TDP) of 285 W and a large, 3-slot size, it is recommended to use a power supply of 600 W and a case with sufficient space to accommodate the card. Compare your card's model and your case's dimensions to verify compatibility.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has the 7th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 71.45% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 74,834 score and $799 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 93.66. This is the 23rd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
About the AMD Radeon R9 Nano GPU
The AMD Radeon R9 Nano is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q3 2015 with a MSRP of $649. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Fiji) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The R9 Nano has 4 GB of HBM memory, with a 500 MHz memory clock and a 4,096 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 512 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R9 Nano includes 4,096 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 256 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The R9 Nano occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 450 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 175 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The R9 Nano has the 133rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 16.50% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 17,282 score and $649 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 26.63. This is the 82nd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 3.0 |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q1 2024 | Q3 2015 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $799 | $649 |
| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | 163 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 142 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 113 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | 77 FPS | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | 40 FPS | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | 49 | +23% |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | 47 | +18% |
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | 46 | +16% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | 39.8 | |
| Radeon RX 7900 XT | 39 | -2% |
| GeForce RTX 3090 | 34 | -15% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | 34 | -15% |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | 31 | -22% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 (12 GB) | 30 | -25% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | 17.21 | -14% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | 17.62 | -12% |
| Radeon RX 7700 XT | 19.52 | -3% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | 20.08 | |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | 20.39 | +2% |
| Arc A770 | 20.56 | +2% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 | 21.7 | +8% |
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | 21.72 | +8% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 22.17 | +10% |
Benchmark Performance
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 333% better performance than the Radeon R9 Nano for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is ranked 7th with a score of 74,834, and the Radeon R9 Nano is ranked 133rd with a score of 17,282.
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 252% better value for the money than the Radeon R9 Nano for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is ranked 23rd with a performance per dollar of 93.66, and the Radeon R9 Nano is ranked 82nd with a performance per dollar of 26.63.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 7900 XT | 75,896 | +1% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | 75,612 | +1% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | 74,834 | |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | 72,227.5 | -3% |
| GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | 69,481 | -7% |
| Radeon R9 FURY | 17,543 | -77% |
| GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB) | 17,401 | -77% |
| Radeon R9 Nano | 17,282 | -77% |
| Radeon R9 290X | 16,167.5 | -78% |
| GeForce GTX 970 | 16,033 | -79% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 95.09 | +2% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | 94.63 | +1% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | 93.66 | |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | 87.14 | -7% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16 GB) | 86.4 | -8% |
| Radeon R9 290X | 29.45 | -69% |
| GeForce GTX 660 Ti | 28.14 | -70% |
| Radeon R9 Nano | 26.63 | -72% |
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 22.34 | -76% |
| GeForce GTX 680 | 20.47 | -78% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 23,695 (+425.27%) | 4,511 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 23,540 (+416.68%) | 4,556 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 165,604 (+103.51%) | 81,374 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 52,738 (+267.21%) | 14,362 |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | 209,177 | -- |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 54,278 (+266.92%) | 14,793 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 317 | -- |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 31,687 | -- |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 1,185 | -- |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | AD103 | Fiji |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Size | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 45,900 million | 8,900 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 16 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | HBM |
| Memory Bandwidth | 672.3 Gb/s | 512 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,313 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 256 bit | 4,096 bit |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 16 KB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 2 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 3 slots | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 285 W | 175 W |
| Suggested PSU | 600 W | 450 W |
| Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Outputs | HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a | HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 4,096 |
| CUDA Cores | 8,448 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 64 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 66 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 264 | 256 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 96 | 64 |
| Tensor Cores | 264 | -- |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 66 | -- |
| Core Clock Speed | 2,340 MHz | 1,000 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 2,610 MHz | -- |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 250.6 GPixel/s | 64 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 689 GTexel/s | 256 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 44.1 TFLOPS | 8.19 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 689 GFLOPS | 512 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.